January 2010 - rel-eng - Fedora mailing-lists

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: notting | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Rawhide tree expiry is manual at the moment, unless I missed something. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1107> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 8

#2244: How to mass branch s390utils and other non-primary arch packages
by Fedora Release Engineering 17 Jul '13

17 Jul '13

#2244: How to mass branch s390utils and other non-primary arch packages --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: toshio | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- This is a rel-eng decision that I'll need input on. Currently the packagedb branches packages which are not blocked in koji. Some packages which are not built for the primary arch are blocked in koji -- s390utils for instance. Does the packagedb need to whitelist these or should the packages be unblocked as they are discovered? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2244> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 5

#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable
by Fedora Release Engineering 18 Oct '12

18 Oct '12

#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: hadess | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- It's too complicated, human-dependent, and time-consuming to build interdependent package updates in stable releases. Two cases: * gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base are released at the same time, and so are pre-releases of those. They soft-depend on each other (gstreamer can be updated on its own). It's currently not possible for me to offer both pre-releases of gstreamer and gsteamer-plugins-base without either: 1. asking for a package to be tagged into the build roots 2. pushing gstreamer into stable (takes a few days at best), and push the gstreamer-plugins-base package separately * gnome-bluetooth and gnome-phone-manager, where I need to ask for gnome- bluetooth to be pushed into the buildroot tree. Sometimes that just doesn't work (as could have been seen in http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7140 / https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1945 and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112091 ) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2025> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

[Fedora Release Engineering] #859: updates-newkey doesn't have group_gz member
by Fedora Release Engineering 27 Jan '12

27 Jan '12

#859: updates-newkey doesn't have group_gz member -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: james(a)fedoraproject.org | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I assume the createrepo instance that generates the Fedora 9 updates- newkey/updates-testing-newkey is the RHEL-5 version? Can we change this to be the Fedora 9 version so that we'll get group_gz as well as group (ie. comps.xml.gz as well as comps.xml). This makes for much less data to download, to get group information. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/859> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 12

#1909: Clarify final freeze policy
by Fedora Release Engineering 06 Nov '10

06 Nov '10

#1909: Clarify final freeze policy ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-May/msg00590.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1909> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#3239: deltarpm missing for eclipse update (F12) - 3.5.1-20 => -21
by Fedora Release Engineering 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

#3239: deltarpm missing for eclipse update (F12) - 3.5.1-20 => -21 --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: bbaetz | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- An update to eclipse was pushed today, however the eclipse packages don't have the appropriate drpms available. A drpm is available from the 'base' eclipse-jdt-3.5.1-4.fc12, but not from the last update to -20 (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-11860) For example, I had eclipse-jdt-3.5.1-20.fc12.x86_64.rpm installed. /fedora/linux/updates/12/x86_64/drpms/ on my local mirror has eclipse- jdt-3.5.1-4.fc12_3.5.1-21.fc12.x86_64.drpm but no other relevant file. I can generate a drpm locally using makedeltarpm, and apply it to the koji (unsigned) -20 package to get an identical package. This means that I have to download a 24M package rather than a 94k drpm. (Similarly for the 27M eclipse-platform package) Some packages (eg NetworkManager) do have a drpm from both the initial version and the previous updated version. I've seen this happen before (missing drpm) with other packages (internet caps in .au means I notice large package updates), but haven't previously looked into why. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3239> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#2555: handle invalid build ID in sigulsign_unsigned
by Fedora Release Engineering 26 May '10

26 May '10

#2555: handle invalid build ID in sigulsign_unsigned ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Right now the whole process dies if one of the n-v-rs don't match. We should handle that better. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2555> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#2262: README in images directory is out of date
by Fedora Release Engineering 26 May '10

26 May '10

#2262: README in images directory is out of date -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: muerte | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- I was helping with Fedora Test day and I noticed that the README in the images directory is woefully out of date. http://mirror.web- ster.com/fedora/releases/test/12-Alpha/Fedora/x86_64/os/images/README There is no mention of any of the .img, no explanation of what they are, or how to use them. This should probably have a little more information so people know what they're looking at. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2262> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#2328: 1 package missing from mirrors
by Fedora Release Engineering 24 Mar '10

24 Mar '10

#2328: 1 package missing from mirrors -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: limb | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 12 Final | Component: koji Keywords: | -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- libguestfs-1.0.70-2.fc11 and libguestfs-1.0.70-1.fc11 were both announced at the same time, only libguestfs-1.0.70-1.fc11 is present. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2328> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 32

#3211: Fedora buildboxes have messed up /dev/pts after the weekend outage
by Fedora Release Engineering 21 Feb '10

21 Feb '10

#3211: Fedora buildboxes have messed up /dev/pts after the weekend outage --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jakub | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- wget http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/private/ptstest-1-1.src.rpm koji build --scratch dist-f12-updates-candidate ptstest-1.1.src.rpm shows: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1879259 that /dev/pts isn't mounted in the buildroots at all (not just with bad permissions as it used to be in F11) and /dev/ptmx is a symlink to /dev/pts/ptmx which doesn't exist. This means that expect/dejagnu don't work at all, and is a show stopper for F12/F13 gcc development, because no gcc build is actually tested (all tests fail). Please fix this ASAP. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3211> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#1939: New wine subpackages which need to be copied to x86_64
by Fedora Release Engineering 20 Feb '10

20 Feb '10

#1939: New wine subpackages which need to be copied to x86_64 ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: awjb | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------+--------------------------------------------------------- There will be two more subpackages for wine which need to be copied to the x86_64 repo (see https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1427810) wine-alsa wine-oss Please adjust the scripts accordingly. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1939> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 6

#2012: Build root isolation
by Fedora Release Engineering 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

#2012: Build root isolation ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: stransky | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Please isolate buildroot from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1534857 I need to check the build error (It's produced by koji only, local builds went fine). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2012> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3335: Copy PySolFC-cardsets-2.0-1 to F-12 and devel
by Fedora Release Engineering 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

#3335: Copy PySolFC-cardsets-2.0-1 to F-12 and devel ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: firewing | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Because the contents of PySolFC-cardsets rarely changes and it's a large download, I've opted to use no dist tag. Earlier today I updated PySolFC to 2.x from 1.x, so if possible I'd like to copy the RPMs in PySolFC- cardsets-2.0-1 for dist-f11-updates-candidate to the devel and F-12 repos. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3335> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3336: Please block aseqmm from dist-f13
by Fedora Release Engineering 01 Feb '10

01 Feb '10

#3336: Please block aseqmm from dist-f13 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: kkofler | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ aseqmm has been renamed to drumstick by upstream. The renamed package is now reviewed and in Rawhide and I retired aseqmm (marked dead.package in CVS, retired in pkgdb), so please block aseqmm from dist-f13. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3336> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3334: Please put getdata-0.6.0-1.fc12 into the f12 buildroot.
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3334: Please put getdata-0.6.0-1.fc12 into the f12 buildroot. --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mtruch | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Please put getdata-0.6.0 into the f12 buildroot so that I can build kst against it. A user stumbled upon a bug that was fixed in this newer version of getdata and a SONAME bump in getdata requires a rebuild of kst. Thanks. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3334> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3295: Need buildroot override for 389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.1.a1
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3295: Need buildroot override for 389-ds-base-1.2.6-0.1.a1 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rmeggins | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- I have pushed an updated package 389-ds-base-1.2.6.a1 to testing for EPEL-4, EPEL-5, and the current fedora releases. This package has two new sub packages - 389-ds-base-selinux and 389-ds-base-selinux-devel that must be in the buildroot in order to build the new 389-admin-1.1.11 package for testing. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3295> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

Re: #3323: Release Alpha: Notify mirrors of upcoming Alpha release
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3323: Release Alpha: Notify mirrors of upcoming Alpha release ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 13 Alpha | Component: other Resolution: | Keywords: release-task ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by jkeating): * summary: Notify mirrors of upcoming Alpha release (Release Alpha) => Release Alpha: Notify mirrors of upcoming Alpha release -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3323#comment:1> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

Re: #3321: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Official Live Images
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3321: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Official Live Images ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 13 Alpha | Component: other Resolution: | Keywords: release-task ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by jkeating): * summary: Official Live Images (3318) => Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Official Live Images -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3321#comment:1> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

Re: #3320: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Spins
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3320: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Spins ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 13 Alpha | Component: other Resolution: | Keywords: release-task ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by jkeating): * summary: Spins (3318) => Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Spins -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3320#comment:1> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

Re: #3319: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Install CD/DVD (installation media)
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

#3319: Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Install CD/DVD (installation media) ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 13 Alpha | Component: other Resolution: | Keywords: release-task ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by jkeating): * summary: Install CD/DVD (installation media) (3318) => Create Alpha Release Candidate (RC): Install CD/DVD (installation media) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3319#comment:1> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

#3298: Urgent help needed - test update cannot be pulled!
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

#3298: Urgent help needed - test update cannot be pulled! -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mschwendt | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- I've run into a series of problems with bodhi. https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/385 The latest defect is that the test update is "pending", but the packages are in the updates-testing repo and tagged accordingly, too. This is like that since yesterday. I _cannot_ edit the bodhi ticket to pull them and push a newer audacious release (2.2-10.fc12), since the packages are stuck in updates-testing. They are not moved back and tagged as candidates. Help! Is it possible to pull the packages? The test update is broken and requires another fix. I'd like to move on with this. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3298> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

SOP for your review
by John Poelstra 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

The dangerous duo of Jesse and John strikes again! Please review the latest SOP in advance of our meeting Monday so we can ratify it and start work on the next one. :) *Please make all changes to the wiki page.* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Purging_orphaned_packages Read it and review it from the perspective of: o not having any familiarity with the environment o could you execute this SOP using only the information presented on this page? New SOP writers are welcome at any time. You write up the raw text and I'll format it, proof it and put it on a wiki page. What could be easier? John

1 0

#3288: block 'sigen' from F-11, F-12 and rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering 28 Jan '10

28 Jan '10

#3288: block 'sigen' from F-11, F-12 and rawhide ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: tomspur | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ sigen was retired, because upstream is dead and nothing else requires it anyway. (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/sigen/) Please bock sigen from F-11, F-12 and rawhide. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3288> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#3296: Block lxde-settings-daemon from rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering 28 Jan '10

28 Jan '10

#3296: Block lxde-settings-daemon from rawhide ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: cwickert | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Please remove lxde-settings-daemon from rawhide because it's functionality was merged into lxsession with 0.4.0. The package has been retired in pkgdb and marked dead in CVS. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3296> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3297: rename qpidc into qpid-cpp in F13 and rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering 28 Jan '10

28 Jan '10

#3297: rename qpidc into qpid-cpp in F13 and rawhide ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: nsantos | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ The qpidc package for F13 and rawhide needs to be renamed to qpid-cpp, to keep with upstream changes (fwiw, RHEL6 has already made the change). The specfile will have the necessary obsoletes. Could you please create the qpid-cpp top-level module for those two branches? Thanks, Nuno -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3297> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng January 2010