June 2011 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

#4766: Please block razertool from rawhide

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4766: Please block razertool from rawhide ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: nsoranzo | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- razertool is dead upstream and has been deprecated by its maintainer Andreas Osowski (th0br0). Please block it from any future composes. Thanks, Nicola -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4766> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#4765: Block rubygem-sqlite3-ruby on rawhide

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4765: Block rubygem-sqlite3-ruby on rawhide ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mtasaka | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Hello.[[BR]] [[BR]] rubygem-sqlite3-ruby is renamed to rubygem-sqlite3, which obsoletes rubygem-sqlite3-ruby. Please make rubygem-sqlite3-ruby blocked on rawhide, thank you.[[BR]] Unfortunately I cannot retire rubygem-sqlite3-ruby on pkgdb, and the current owner kanarip seems busy.[[BR]] [[BR]] ref:[[BR]] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-June/000524.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4765> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#4764: buildroot override: 389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.el6

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4764: buildroot override: 389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.el6 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rmeggins | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: override | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Need 389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.el6 in epel6 buildroot in order to build 389 packages that depend on it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4764> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#4763: buildroot override: idm-console-framework-1.1.7-1.el6

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4763: buildroot override: idm-console-framework-1.1.7-1.el6 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rmeggins | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: override | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Need idm-console-framework-1.1.7-1.el6 added to epel6 buildroot in order to build 389 console packages. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4763> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#4762: Unblock all 389 packages except 389-ds-base for EPEL6

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4762: Unblock all 389 packages except 389-ds-base for EPEL6 ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rmeggins | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- 389-ds-base is going into RHEL6, but none of the other 389 packages are. I would like to be able to build EPEL6 packages for the following: idm- console-framework 389-adminutil 389-admin 389-console 389-admin-console 389-ds-console 389-dsgw 389-ds When I try to build one of these now, I get the following error: BuildError: package 389-adminutil is blocked for tag dist-6E-epel-testing- candidate I guess I need the packages unblocked. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4762> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
1
0 / 0

#4761: override tag request for saphire

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4761: override tag request for saphire ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mtasaka | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Hello.[[BR]] [[BR]] I am going to upgrade mfiler3. This needs new saphire in buildroot. Please make the following pkg(s) taged as override, thank you[[BR]] [[BR]] saphire-3.1.2-1.fc14 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4761> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

#4760: rawhide older than f15-testing (glibc)

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4760: rawhide older than f15-testing (glibc) ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jankratochvil | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/fedora.redhat.com/linux/updates/testin... [[BR]] contains: glibc-2.13.90-14.x86_64.rpm http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/fedora.redhat.com/linux/development/ra... [[BR]] contains: glibc-2.13.90-9.x86_64.rpm 2 days old: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=245753 [[BR]] contains: glibc-2.14-1.x86_64 Rawhide is broken by the old version and how can be Rawhide older than f15 -updates-testing? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4760> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
6
0 / 0

#4262: Provide deltaisos for Alpha, Beta, Final

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4262: Provide deltaisos for Alpha, Beta, Final ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: robatino | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- For a while now I've been providing deltaisos between Alpha, Beta, and Final (in addition to the ones for TCs/RCs) at [http://thepiratebay.org/user/andre14965/]. * When N Alpha is released I create 2 torrents from (N-1) Final to N Alpha (one for i386 and one for x86_64). * When N Beta is released I create 2 torrents from (N-1) Final to N Beta, and 2 torrents from N Alpha to N Beta. * When N Final is released I create 2 torrents from (N-1) Final to N Final, and 2 torrents from N Beta to N Final. For each milestone, each corresponding torrent consists of * The old and new signed checksum files for the full ISOs, * A deltaiso from the old DVD to the new DVD, and * Deltaisos from the new DVD to each of the new CDs and the new netinst (since split media is gone for F15 and later, only the one for DVD -> netinst will be needed in the future). The size of the diso for DVD -> netinst is negligible (around 50K or less). The size of the disos starting with (N-1) Final is roughly half the size of the full ISO, and increases only slightly from N Alpha to N Beta to N Final. The size of the disos for N Alpha -> N Beta and N Beta -> N Final is around 10-20% of the full ISO size (you can see the exact sizes at the above torrent link). The same exact format could be used to provide these torrents at [http://torrent.fedoraproject.org]. For direct download mirrors, just the disos could be posted. It's unnecessary to create any new signed checksum files. It may be desirable to provide a crude checksum for the disos just to make sure the download is good before running applydeltaiso (which can take a significant amount of time - around 40-45 minutes for the disos starting with (N-1) Final, and around 10-20 minutes for the ones from N Alpha -> N Beta and N Beta -> N Final - the time for DVD -> netinst is negligible). The main obstacle is that each RPM in the new ISO must be compressed using the exact same compression. For example, the recent change in xz compression means that Rawhide currently consists of RPMs built using both the old and new compression, so it would be impossible to generate working disos from 14 Final to either 15 Alpha, 15 Beta, or 15 Final. Deltaisos for 15 Alpha -> 15 Beta and 15 Beta -> 15 Final should work (assuming that the user has the new xz installed on the machine which runs applydeltaiso). For the user to temporarily change xz version is a minor nuisance - someone running anything from F11 to F14 can temporarily change the xz-\* packages to the F15/Rawhide version, and someone running F15/Rawhide can temporarily downgrade xz-\* to the F14 version. Of course it's important to restore the original versions of xz-\* after running applydeltaiso, otherwise yum-presto won't be able to apply drpms in updates. Some links regarding the xz compression change: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644046 * http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-October/144651.html * http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094883.html * https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4224 I volunteer to do any necessary work in creating and checking the diso content (though it's actually pretty trivial) or in writing user documentation. In closing I'd like to point out that although refining compression in order to reduce the size of full ISOs is important, at some point there will be diminishing returns (I don't know if it's reasonable to expect the large improvement of 10-15% in going from gzip to xz to happen again). On the other hand, there's no reason to expect delta compression, which reduces download size by 50% or more, to get any worse. So in the long run, it doesn't make sense to keep ignoring delta compression in the quest to make ISOs a few percent smaller. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4262> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

#4342: Multi-spin DVD review

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4342: Multi-spin DVD review --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: ke4qqq | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Can RelEng review and proffer its opinion on the multi-spin DVD, preferably resulting in a thumbs up/down. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4342> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
3
0 / 0

#4350: The 20 Jan 2011 Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance Test Plan #1 w/o images

by Fedora Release Engineering

#4350: The 20 Jan 2011 Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance Test Plan #1 w/o images ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: hongqing | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- This ticket is intended to track task 6 on the [http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html F15 rel-eng schedule]. The created images will be used to execute the [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_Plan Rawhide acceptance test plan]. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4350> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

12 years, 10 months

1
9
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng June 2011