July 2018 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[releng] Issue #7584: Change Review request for minishift iso

by Praveen Kumar

kumarpraveen reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue We have created the wiki for https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/Minishift_Spin to have fedora ISO for minishift for that we need your team review. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Sooner would be better. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) N/A * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? We will not be going to have fedora iso from our official channel :( `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7584

5 years

4
4
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7551: Self contained change review request

by Lukáš Tyrychtr

tyrylu reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Hello. I'd like someone from release engineering to review this proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_festival_to_2.5 Thanks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7551

5 years

5
12
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7645: module metadata in releases/28/Modular/$basearch/os/repodata/ has no context or arch

by Daniel Mach

dmach reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue Module metadata in released F28 repos has no context or arch. This impacts new libnf module dependency resolution code that needs both for proper functionality. More details in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1603109 * When do you need this? (2018/07/20) * When is this no longer needed or useful? (2019/05/07) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? New libdnf with dependency resolution that supports stream expansion and architectures won't work on Fedora 28. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7645

5 years

3
4
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7522: koji authentication is unreliable

by Till Maas

till reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` When trying to build, koji errors too often (IMHO) with AuthError: unable to obtain a session For example for 51 builds it happened 7 times and every time some builds before and afterwards cold be submitted without a problem, so it was not a outage but happenes every few builds. IMHO this is an indication that something is somehow broken, not sure what. The requests that failed were to build snownews qdevelop python-oslo-vmware ptlib opal nuvola-app-tunein nodejs-utf8 Here is some info about the tasks that were created before and afterwards to help identifying the exact times to be able to look into the logs: ``` Created task: 27243633 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27243633 Rebuilding nuvola-app-tunein AuthError: unable to obtain a session Command '['koji', 'build', '--nowait', '--background', 'rawhide', 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-tunein.git?#7608d8e356d...']' returned non-zero exit status 1. Created task: 27243642 Created task: 27244803 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27244803 Rebuilding opal AuthError: unable to obtain a session Command '['koji', 'build', '--nowait', '--background', 'rawhide', 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opal.git?#ae968fe460fe56a1dad0c0a2...']' returned non-zero exit status 1. Created task: 27244810 Created task: 27245354 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27245354 Rebuilding ptlib AuthError: unable to obtain a session Command '['koji', 'build', '--nowait', '--background', 'rawhide', 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ptlib.git?#58737509e4992ef8812e9ee...']' returned non-zero exit status 1. Created task: 27245366 Created task: 27245763 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27245763 Rebuilding qdevelop AuthError: unable to obtain a session Command '['koji', 'build', '--nowait', '--background', 'rawhide', 'git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qdevelop.git?#e4caa9d3e7ac737a9601...']' returned non-zero exit status 1. Created task: 27245767 ``` `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7522

5 years

3
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7325: Cinnamon spin rawhide compose missing critical packages

by Dan Book

grinnz reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` The Cinnamon livemedia compose is missing several packages that are dependencies of the 'cinnamon' metapackage, despite including that package and others from the @cinnamon-desktop group as the kickstart has been unchanged. The issue seems to have started occurring after 2018-01-06, the earliest compose log that's still there is: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live/Rawhide... and here is one from today: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live/Rawhide... These logs say "Downloading 1426 RPMs" or so, I don't have the logs from 2018-01-05 and earlier but the number is supposed to be around 1470. As the kickstart isn't doing anything except including the @cinnamon-desktop group itself, I'm not sure how to debug this further. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7325

5 years

6
11
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7311: Cleanup repositories with "dead.package"

by Igor Gnatenko

ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` It would be very nice if you could set up automatic removal of all files except `dead.package` for repositories. Since `rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz` is not updated very often, I try to run grep on all git repositories, but unfortunately there are packages which are dead but still have spec file in there. I know that I could filter all such packages, but I think it would be better to clean them up anyway. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7311

5 years

7
13
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7268: Wrongly-formed `Fedora-Modular--updates-testing-20171031.0` compose still present in updates dir

by Adam Williamson

adamwill reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Going by fedmsg logs, there have been some very wrongly-formed attempts at update composes (my personal favourite is `Fedora-Modular-f27-updates-updates-Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.0`...), but most of them seem to have been cleaned up. There is still one that's clearly wrong, though, this one: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/Fedora-Modular--update... It was obviously meant to be `Fedora-Modular-27-updates-testing-20171031.0`, but somehow lost the release number. It'd make things cleaner if it got killed, I think. (There's probably very little value in keeping *any* of those `Fedora-Modular-27-updates-testing` composes around, but I'll leave that to you to figure out). @mohanboddu `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7268

5 years

3
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7212: rubygem-factory_girl is not properly tagged in F27+

by Vít Ondruch

vondruch reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` I was wondering why rubygem-factory_girl is not build by Koschei \[[1]\] and I was told by @msimacek that the package is not properly tagged for F28: ~~~ $ koji list-tagged --inherit f28-build --latest | grep rubygem-factory_girl ~~~ Please note that the package was incorrectly unbolcked in #6904 and the unblocking was later fixed by #6982, so this still might be some outfall of this. Not sure ... [1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/rubygem-factory_girl `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7212

5 years

3
4
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7206: Tag cockpit-ws container for f27

by Peter Volpe

pvolpe reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` We need a cockpit container for f27. The lastest build is here. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1000116 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7206

5 years

4
3
0 / 0

[releng] Issue #7201: Initial discussion for rpm-ostree jigdo ♲📦

by Colin Walters

walters reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` See https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081 and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject... Goal here is to determine initial design of integration; the whole idea is to decrease the burden on releng so hopefully we succeed at that! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7201

5 years

5
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng July 2018