On Tuesday, May 05, 2015 06:19:23 PM Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 05:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> correct. at the moment it is really unknown.
it = risk?
it = "traceability"?
Both
> at this point in the release
> cycle I am extremely change adverse. I want to avoid anything that has the
> potential to cause a slip in any way shape or form.
But...currently Atomic is non-blocking, and if somehow this change were
to break generating the installer, it's a matter of...something like the
attached patch?
we would deal with the failure as it happened. if it failed to
compose when
the final RC compose completes then it owuld miss the boat for F22 and would
be completely absent. we have an integrated process. so there is no do overs
or makeups. If you are okay with risking missing F22 altogether then we can do
something. as I said earlier we can and should be looking now at what changes
should be getting made for Fedora 23.
Dennis