On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:21:14PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 9/9/19 2:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/9/19 10:34 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:02 PM Dusty Mabe <dusty(a)dustymabe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> There are three communication streams I'm concerned with:
>>>
>>> 1. releng list posts
>>> 2. pagure repo ticket discussion not related to scm requests
>>> 3. pagure repo ticket discussion related to scm requests
>>>
>>> I think 1+2 are representative of discussions about releng, relevant
changes,
>>> and potential future. 3. is kind of noise that drowns 1/2 out.
>>>
>> Agreed. I'd like to keep up with 1 and 2 to be aware of things that
>> may impact releases, etc. 3 is noise from my perspective. So removing
>> the list from the Pagure repo doesn't help me because I'd still want
>> to follow the repo to get 2. If it's more work/overhead for the folks
>> actually doing the work, I'll deal with the noise, but if we can
>> separate 2 and 3, it would help folks who lurk.
>
> Well, as I mentioned, a lot of the scm requests should hopefully go away
> or be reduced soon. There's a pagure plugin thats being worked on that
> IIRC will allow people to just orphan/take orphans, so the only thing
> that will need to be tickets are unretirements (since that requires
> unblocking in koji).
+1 - is that 3 months away? 6 months away? 12 months?
It's already in staging :)
What it needs is some changes to the-new-hotness to make use of the integration
that plugin also offers with it.
(And a script to migrate the info from the current git repo into the database).
Pierre