Re: [PATCH] run-pungi: atomic: Change the `ostree_osname` to be fedora-atomic

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, May 1, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:56:46 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015, at 08:27 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>  > > Does that explain things better?  Thanks!
>  > 
>  > I know there's a lot going on, but I'm wondering if this patch
>  > is still in the queue for review by someone, based on the above
>  > explanation.
>  
>  It his not in queue for review. the os name should match the image name.\ 
After discussion with Adam W,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_fedora_image_naming_po...
is now updated to explicitly state that the policy is not normative for
OSTree "osname"s (or other things like yum repo IDs, Docker image names, etc).

I feel like my "vote" as the upstream author of OSTree (with designs for how it
should be used)
and as one of the primary maintainers of this specific content set is
not being respected.  

I'm absolutely willing to have a discussion here - we could change the identiifer
to something other than "fedora-atomic" - for example, it would be consistent
with the Docker base image if it was simply fedora/.  

For convenience I've reattached the patch.  Thanks!