On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:10:05PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > Probably because of timestamps these won't be bit-for-bit identical,
> > right? I think we need to either guarantee that they are (which seems
> > like a tall order, unless I am being dense), or else run the two-week
> > artifacts through another round of automated testing.
> I'm don't understand the question.
The proposal calls for ISOs and various cloud images to be created
twice, right? From the same content, but still new artifacts. And it
mentions the _first_ set going through AutoCloud but not the second.
Correct me if I'm being dumb, please. :)
It does, you are correct and it's likely something we need to keep in
mind as well as weigh the benefits of re-running the tests. However,
if we use the same tools to build the same artifacts out of the same
compose content and it doesn't work the same as the original creation
of those artifacts then we have bigger issues than it not passing
AutoCloud tests. (Though it could be a good metric for verification)
> Matthew Miller
> Fedora Project Leader