siosm opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/a04846a9bcb04674a152...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/36bfcbfa13054a589852bdf...) : SUCCESS in 2m 05s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8c0b5401e611470ca049e81...) : SUCCESS in 2m 16s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` We need to fix ./roles/bodhi2/backend/files/new-updates-sync in ansible repo for this first. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
siosm commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` As far as I can see we don't have F42 listed in that file yet so I'm not sure what to do ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` Ah, oops. Indeed you are right.
I was thinking of nightly.sh here... which tries to sync ppc64le, but I guess just ignores if the ref isn't there?
Also, do we need to do anything to remove existing ppc64le refs so they don't just sit there forever and not get updated? Or should we just leave them for now?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
siosm commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: ``
I was thinking of nightly.sh here... which tries to sync ppc64le, but I guess just ignores if the ref isn't there?
Good catch, updated.
Also, do we need to do anything to remove existing ppc64le refs so they don't just sit there forever and not get updated? Or should we just leave them for now?
I think we can remove the PPC64LE refs for rawhide once this is merged and then the older ones will get removed when we start doing garbage collection for the ostree repo (I don't know if we do anything like that right now for the Atomic Desktops, like we do for Fedora CoreOS). ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/72666a9e6bb240738732...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4f2ecf8ab53f4efaa9dcff9...) : SUCCESS in 2m 17s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/6030be7bf449471db65daa0...) : SUCCESS in 2m 06s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE` that you are following: `` Looks good. Lets go. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1432
kevin merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Atomic Desktops: Stop building for PPC64LE ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
siosm
-
Zuul CI Bot (Fabien Boucher)