3:29 p.m.
walters opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are
following:
``
WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
3:30 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
(Not tested locally but hopefully someone can try this in stage or so?)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
3:24 a.m.
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
hmm - so I'm not 100% sure on this. I think if we deliver new ISOs we need to qualify
them in some way more than what we are doing for atomic workstation now.
one thing I think would actually be better... is for us to offer an option inside the
interactive anaconda install to install from repo (i.e. grab latest), which would
essentially do the same thing as providing a new ISO
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
5:06 a.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
We can pretty easily hook things up in OpenQA right? I'm not really concerned about
the risk here - the target audience is small and technically inclined. If we have the
previous ISO to point at temporarily and in-place updates work, that's OK.
As far as updating inside the installer; yes, I agree that's a useful feature but
it's not quite the same thing; among other issues you have to pay an increasingly
large network cost as the delta between the ISO cache and tip grows. A lot of people
actually put the ISOs on USB sticks intending to do offline installs.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
12:28 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
I guess the other option here is to roll this into the existing Atomic Host configs. That
has some benefits (FA{H,W} are built in the same run) and some downsides (we probably
don't want people looking for AH to find this in the same dir, at least not
initially).
I lean towards having a separate config myself; among other things as far as I'm
concerned it doesn't even need to run every day (maybe every week by default, plus
on-demand).
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
1:12 p.m.
ausil commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
lets point ar the released location not development
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
2:21 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
lets point ar the released location not development
I just copied the existing `atomic.conf` one, but yep, fixed this one. I also fixed the
disk size to be `8` and dropped `WIP` from the title.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
3:13 p.m.
adamwill commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
There is some duplication here: we already have a 'variant' for this, called
WorkstationOstree.
This should probably be compared/contrasted/reconciled with @dustymabe 's #498 .
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
3:22 p.m.
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
There is some duplication here: we already have a 'variant'
for this, called WorkstationOstree.
This should probably be compared/contrasted/reconciled with @dustymabe 's
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/498
yeah. i'm planning to revive that PR here soon.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
11:55 a.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
It doesn't seem to me this needs to block on 498 but I have no opposition to doing
that first either.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
12:59 p.m.
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
It doesn't seem to me this needs to block on 498 but I have no
opposition to doing that first either.
I'm hoping the 2nd f29 run from today gives us good results. Then I'll carry
forward with #498.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
1:41 p.m.
adamwill commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
@walters the main thing I'd like to avoid is having two variants defined that are
basically the same thing.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
3:25 p.m.
adamwill commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
So, a couple of things. I think it would be best for this to rename the 'Workstation
Ostree' variant to 'AtomicWorkstation', just as #498 did on master branch.
Otherwise we have two variants that are basically the same thing.
Second, this commit doesn't add anything that actually *runs* the new compose.
We'd need a new nightly script (like the ones for Atomic, Docker, Cloud). Or, I guess,
if you only wanted to run the compose weekly, call it a 'weekly' script :)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
4:18 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
I'd really, really like to have respins of the released ISO. What needs to happen for
that?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
8:12 a.m.
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
Here are some questions?
- Do you just want respins (easy), or do you want them officially released (hard
ENOTIME)?
- Do you need it for f27 or can we concentrate on f28?
- I'd really like to include these respin runs for FAH AND FAW in the bodhi runs; see
[releng issue](https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7113) and [taiga
card](https://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/project/acarter-fedora-docker-at....
I'd prefer to add FAW to the respins when we make that change.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
2:50 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
I don't know what the difference between a "respin" and "official
release" is exactly. Basically something like
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/ ?
Yes, f27 since f28 is broken. Even after f28 is out, then we'll have the exact same
problem with f28.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
2:38 p.m.
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
I don't know what the difference between a "respin" and
"official release" is exactly.
a "respin" is just a daily run of pungi to create new media. an official release
would involve taken the "respin" and signing a checksum of the artifacts,
getting it on mirrors, website updated, etc. Basically we can't really promote it
without doing that 2nd part, which I've identified as the part that actually requires
work.
Basically something like
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/ ?
That's easy, but see above where I identify the problem.
Yes, f27 since f28 is broken.
Hoping to get that fixed soon.
Even after f28 is out, then we'll have the exact same problem
with f28.
Agree. One thing that is nice about starting with f28, though, is that we've already
done the variant name change from `WorkstationOstree` to `AtomicWorkstation` there. I
don't really want to go back to do that for f27.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
4:26 p.m.
walters commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
an official release would involve taken the "respin" and
signing a checksum of the artifacts, getting it on mirrors, website updated,
I think all I'd like is the signing of the checksums. The only website (AFAIK) that
even talks about this is
[workstation-ostree-config](https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config) which is just a
`git push` to update the link to the current ISO.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
4:08 p.m.
kevin commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
So, where are we here? I think we are making isos now on every updates push, so this is
solved? Or is there still something to do here?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
2:56 a.m.
humaton commented on the pull-request: ` WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config` that you are
following:
``
Hi, this PR was opened for an old fedora-release that is EOL now. If it is still relevant
could you please reopen it to the current release?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
2:56 a.m.
humaton closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that
you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
WIP: Add fedora-atomic-ws config
``
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/502
1138
days inactive
2278
days old
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
20 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Adam Williamson -
Colin Walters
-
Dennis Gilmore
-
Dusty Mabe
-
Kevin Fenzi
-
Tomáš Hrčka