humaton opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Fedora 39 Beta 1.1 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1197
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Fedora 39 Beta 1.1` that you are following: `` two minor things:
1. I see theres actually no f39 zchunk data yet... we may need to ask @jdieter if he can update that or show us how. I don't know if it will cause any issue if its not there.
2. shouldn't template_branch be f39 instead of main?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1197
jdieter commented on the pull-request: `Fedora 39 Beta 1.1` that you are following: `` Regarding the zchunk data, I'm assuming you mean the F39 zdicts are missing. I just checked the last nightly compose and it looks like the zchunk repodata is being generated properly.
The only issue with missing zdicts is that the compressed zchunk files are maybe 30-50% larger without them, which is obviously not ideal, but shouldn't break anything.
I've just generated zdicts for the latest F39 metadata, updated `fedora-repo-zdicts`, built it for all active EPEL/Fedora branches, and have submitted updates in bodhi. If you update `fedora-repo-zdicts` on whichever servers/containers are generating the repodata, the zchunk files will be compressed with the latest zdicts (and, as a result, be significantly smaller).
Finally, on the off chance that I get hit by a bus, the process for generating new zdicts is documented in the git repo in Pagure: https://pagure.io/fedora-repo-zdicts ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1197
humaton commented on the pull-request: `Fedora 39 Beta 1.1` that you are following: `` Good catch @kevin, fixed now.
Thanks for the link @jdieter ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1197
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Fedora 39 Beta 1.1` that you are following: `` Thanks @jdieter! We would need a infra freeze break to update the composers, but I can put in for one.
I think this is all set to merge.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1197
kevin merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Fedora 39 Beta 1.1 ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jonathan Dieter -
Kevin Fenzi
-
Tomáš Hrčka