mattia opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Change createrepo_c settings to zstd ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` So, I don't think we should push this on a friday. ;)
And we should probibly advertise it some.
I was surprised rhel9 createrepo_c still doesn't have zstd support. ;(
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` So, I dropped the ball on this one. ;) Well, I was also dragging my feet some...
But it looks like https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67689 (rhel9 createrepo_c support) isn't going to be solved anytime soon...
Should we just bite the bullet and do it? Or wait for that? I do fear it's going to break a lot of rhel9 consumers that merge/do things to the repos (koji/pulp), but... we can't wait forever. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
mattia commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Would setting up a COPR repo to rebuild createrepo_c >1.0 for EL9 and suggesting who needs it to upgrade using the COPR repo a feasible workaround? Whoever is trying to use F41 updates repository under rhel9 is already broken. I think this change will break Rawhide? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Yeah, it could be... but rebuilding > 1.0 will have the defaults changes, so would it be more helpful to just rebuild the existing rhel9 one with --enable zstd?
Would you be able to do that? or want me to?
Yeah, f41 updates is already changed, this would affect rawhide. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
mattia commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` I can try, but I have no RH account to access RHEL SRPMs... shall I use the one from CentOS at https://mirror.stream.centos.org/9-stream/AppStream/source/tree/Packages/ or use the last 0.21 from Fedora 39? Or RHEL sources have higher versions? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
dalley commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: ``
So, I dropped the ball on this one. ;) Well, I was also dragging my feet some...
But it looks like https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67689 (rhel9 createrepo_c support) isn't going to be solved anytime soon...
Should we just bite the bullet and do it? Or wait for that? I do fear it's going to break a lot of rhel9 consumers that merge/do things to the repos (koji/pulp), but... we can't wait forever.
Dunno about Koji, but Pulp won't break because we package our own fresh createrepo_c.
In theory we could just produce a new pre-1.0 version of createrepo_c that includes the zstd support without changing any defaults. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
dalley commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: ``
So, I dropped the ball on this one. ;) Well, I was also dragging my feet some...
But it looks like https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67689 (rhel9 createrepo_c support) isn't going to be solved anytime soon...
Should we just bite the bullet and do it? Or wait for that? I do fear it's going to break a lot of rhel9 consumers that merge/do things to the repos (koji/pulp), but... we can't wait forever.
Dunno about Koji, but Pulp won't break because we package our own fresh createrepo_c.
In theory we could just produce a new pre-1.0 release of createrepo_c that includes the zstd support without changing any defaults. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
sgallagh commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: ``
So, I dropped the ball on this one. ;) Well, I was also dragging my feet some...
But it looks like https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67689 (rhel9 createrepo_c support) isn't going to be solved anytime soon...
Should we just bite the bullet and do it? Or wait for that? I do fear it's going to break a lot of rhel9 consumers that merge/do things to the repos (koji/pulp), but... we can't wait forever.
Dunno about Koji, but Pulp won't break because we package our own fresh createrepo_c.
In theory we could just produce a new pre-1.0 release of createrepo_c that includes the zstd support without changing any defaults.
This honestly feels like the safest approach, if it's feasible. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Could it be published somewhere that we could point others to?
And when should we push this? ;) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
dalley commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` I think this would work code-wise, but it's up to the maintainers (@amatej) to decide what exactly to do here.
https://github.com/dralley/createrepo_c/commits/0.22/ ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
jkolarik commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Hi everyone, are we talking here only about EL9 or possibly also about lower releases? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Well, mostly el9, but if 8 is on the table too that might be nice. :) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
amatej commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` I have created builds in COPR with rhel 8 and 9 versions plus backported zstd support: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/amatej/createrepo_c/
(I could also put them somewhere else if you prefer.) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Awesome. As long as we have a place to point to.
So, I am going to send an email to devel-announce about this, then merge this unless anyone objects quickly. ;) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
kevin merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Change createrepo_c settings to zstd ``
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Change createrepo_c settings to zstd` that you are following: `` Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/70e9660c7b8a4fc5ad20...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8e9f680466e443ee8c5dc25...) : SUCCESS in 2m 26s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b6e231a1f46745fb93bbc63...) : SUCCESS in 1m 59s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1410
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Aleš Matěj -
Daniel Alley
-
Jan Kolarik
-
Kevin Fenzi
-
Mattia Verga
-
Stephen Gallagher
-
Zuul CI Bot (Fabien Boucher)