jnsamyak opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Rawhide is now F42 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1311
jnsamyak commented on the pull-request: `Rawhide is now F42` that you are following: `` From my understanding of gpg and it's public keys, this should be
- 105EF944 SHORT version of fedora-42 key `105ef944` Please confirm this as part of your review. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1311
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Rawhide is now F42` that you are following: `` 2 minor things:
1. disk_size': 42 changes look wrong? Thats just a size, not a 40/42? also that looks... really large. Did we perhaps mess up and change this to 41 last time and before it was something more reasonable in the past?
2. We should ping the osbbuild folks and ask them to make sure they are ready for 42 builds? I am not sure if they have to do anything on their side. They hang our (sometimes?) in the #image-builder:fedoraproject.org room
The key is correct. :) You can get it from sigul with a 'sigul get-public-key fedora-42', import it into your local gpg keyring and you can see the hash there. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1311
jnsamyak commented on the pull-request: `Rawhide is now F42` that you are following: `` yeah fixed the disk_size to 40 as it was earlier before;
I will ping the osbuild folks now ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1311
jnsamyak merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Rawhide is now F42 ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org