patrikp opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Update Pungi filters ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/03e8373ddd004f3e905b...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/20076d1fd34e4baf9f11884...) : SUCCESS in 3m 07s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/e2d491f031414668876674f...) : SUCCESS in 2m 42s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` So, I think this is going to be what we want to do... but we should try and test that it doesn't break the server dvd.
I'm not sure how to easily do that.
I wonder if @adamwill has some way to do so via openqa?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` Unfortunately, no, openQA doesn't build repos.
What's the context, here? The removed filters look like they exist more or less in order to reduce the size of the server "DVD" image...right now it's 2.8G, so it has a lot of space, but we should make sure these don't make it go oversize, I guess? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` Sorry, more context I think was in a releng meeting.
My contention is that dropping all those will not change the server dvd much if any.
Some of those don't even exist anymore, and the ones that do should not be pulled into the dvd media (which is just a server comps set). I think this is leftover from mash days when we were making a everything dvd.
So, I was hoping we had a way to make a new server dvd with this pungi config and confirm that it didn't break / change anything.
But I suppose we can just try it...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` Lets try this. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
kevin merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Update Pungi filters ``
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Update Pungi filters` that you are following: `` Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/1a05781ba15445d6bd89...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/cd6c654e89094969ac29516...) : FAILURE in 2m 21s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/61f37c0129f64dcb85dec75...) : SUCCESS in 2m 29s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1488
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Kevin Fenzi
-
Patrik Polakovič
-
Zuul CI Bot (Fabien Boucher)