adamwill opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` Build succeeded. https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/6e6017fb8a9a4cb4a288...
- [pungi-config-validate ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b27daf8a413147c080879fc...) : SUCCESS in 2m 10s - [validate-variants ](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/571750eadc7045fdb0c97f6...) : SUCCESS in 2m 06s
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
ngompa commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` :thumbsup: ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` I suppose. I recall when we added toolbox that maintainers wanted everything to be failable, but that may have well been before we could build s390x/ppc64le containers (ie, back in the OSBS days).
CC: @rishi ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
kevin merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x ``
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` The decision about what's failable is more of a releng decision than an individual component maintainer decision, I'd say, as it affects *everybody*. I'm pretty sure we've always held that deliverables for non-release-blocking arches must be failable (i.e. must *not* fail the compose). ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` Yeah, really a fesco decision... but there was a change to make toolbox release blocking and neither in the change or the discussion I could find was a mention of what arches it applied to. ;( ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` Well, only x86_64 and aarch64 were added to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f41/blocking/ , so this matches that. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
rishi commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` I didn't realize that we are now building OCI images for `ppc64le` and `s390x`. That's fantastic. Just out of curiosity, is that a consequence of using Kiwi or something else?
When I had submitted the ToolbxReleaseBlocker Change for Fedora 39, I was aware of only the `aarch64` and `x86_64` images, and my intention was to make Toolbx release-blocking on only those architectures that are release-blocking for Fedora in general. So, I won't complain about letting the Toolbx image fail on `ppc64le` and `s390x`. :)
I am happy to help fix the failures, though. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Allow container-toolbox to fail on ppc64le and s390x` that you are following: `` Yeah, the old OSBS system only had x86_64 and aarch64 clusters (you had to make a openshift cluster for each arch).
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1435
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org