[pungi-fedora] PR #1398: Revert "Reapply "Migrate the aarch64 minimal image to osbuild""
adamwill opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Revert "Reapply "Migrate the aarch64 minimal image to osbuild"" ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` Yeah. ;(
Hopefully moving back to IF for that image will not result in problems, we can compare the resulting new IF image with the last osbuild one and see if there are any unexpected differences.
Lets leave f41 nightly on osbuild and switch rawhide and rc's to IF for now? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
pbrobinson commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` It will cause issues, there's a reason we moved to image builder, why hasn't the arm SIG been engaged with this? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
pbrobinson commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` Also where is the reference to the infra ticket for this 'Unable to start secure instance'? Why are we running rough short over process all of a sudden on a weekend when people can't respond? cc: @mattdm ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
kevin commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` The only change so far (this is not merged yet) is that I reverted in rawhide so we could get a compose.
The unable to start has been noted in filed compose tickets and we have been talking to the osbuild folks on matrix about it. I don't know if they have any upstream ticket tracking it. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` Right, it's not an infra issue because we don't run that infra. All we can do is wait on the IB team. This is a problem because we can't realistically expect weekend responses from them, but that is cutting into our ability to build and test 41 composes, which we *do* want to use the weekend for. Still, we did report this to them I think a week ago at least at this point?
Peter, is it viable at all to build the image with IF to get a compose done? I did see the reference in the Change to this letting us drop "workarounds" but I couldn't find any specific details about what changes it enabled, and all the *other* arm disk images are still built with IF. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory` that you are following: `` Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320081 to have wider co-ordination on this. Sounds like we should not merge this PR. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1398
adamwill closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Closed pull-request:
`` Revert ARM minimal disk image build to ImageFactory ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Kevin Fenzi
-
Peter Robinson