yselkowitz opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` [eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1315
sgallagh commented on the pull-request: `[eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42` that you are following: `` This is something that the releng side is supposed to do (and is in their docs): https://docs.pagure.org/releng/sop_mass_branching.html#eln-related-work ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1315
sgallagh commented on the pull-request: `[eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42` that you are following: `` I'm also talking with them about preemptively adding the *future* signing key ahead of time, so we don't break composes during re-signing. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1315
sgallagh commented on the pull-request: `[eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42` that you are following: `` Lastly, the re-signing is incomplete right at the moment, so could you modify this patch to include both the old and new keys for the moment? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1315
yselkowitz commented on the pull-request: `[eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42` that you are following: `` Updated to include both keys. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1315
sgallagh merged a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
`` [eln] Sync from c10s, update signing key to F42 ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Stephen Gallagher -
Yaakov Selkowitz