7:34 a.m.
ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Packaging_Rust_applications_and_li...
Release Engineering are one of key persons in implementing this change because tools
should be ported to DNF, `with` rich operator should be supported from tools (speaking as
DNF team member, it should *just* work).
As a creator of change proposal and member of DNF team, I will help rel-eng as much as I
can.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
6:17 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@mohanboddu I tihnk this is missing f27 label... ;)
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
12:27 p.m.
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We ack this requires releng work and currently we are working on porting our tools to
dnf.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
8:37 a.m.
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Its a huge change and it needs more coordination with the fedora tooling and also more
with internal teams on how things are built, delivered and tested and everything else that
gets effected.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
9:44 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@mohanboddu sure, I wrote this in the beginning ;) do you want me to take any actions now
or just wait until someone from rel-eng will contact me? Ideally, we need this earlier
than final freeze so we have time to submit package reviews, approve them, import them and
such.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
10:14 a.m.
ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@ausil @mohanboddu:
What the heck? Why was this untagged? All the tooling should be in place *now*, with pungi
supporting DNF as a depsolving algorithm. It should have been started to be used with
Rawhide after the porting was done during Fedora 26 development cycle. @ignatenkobrain has
even offered up his services to help speed up any remaining issues through the Fedora 27
development cycle.
:angry:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
9:44 a.m.
ausil added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
we need to ensure that all the systems dealing with packages are able to cope with the
change. This touches on every piece of the delivery pipeline, it needs input from QA, and
infrastructure at the least to make sure we have plans to cope properly.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
10:44 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@ausil
1. Who and when will provide this information?
2. Who and when will provide information what needs to be done in order to accomplish this
change?
P.S. F27 release cycle is quite short, so I need to know precisely who and what will be
doing so I can offer my help and to slip this change to F28 just because someone
didn't pay attention to this.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
4:30 p.m.
ausil added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@adamwill @tflink what state are the QA systems for ensuring that they can all read rpms
with rich dependencies.
@kevin same for infra, likely every system in the build and delivery pipeline that runs
rhel will need to be upgraded.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
5:03 p.m.
kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Well, lets see:
* koji builders are fedora - fine
* koji hubs are rhel7 - would need switching to fedora
* rawhide/branched composers are fedora - fine
* bodhi-backend01 is fedora - fine
so it sounds to me like the hubs would be the main thing. Of course all the tools on those
things... koji, pungi, bodhi would need support.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
2:17 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@kevin note that we need to support here new rich dependency which is coming within F27
itself. Probably we will need RPM 4.14 somewhere on builders (mosr probably). I'm
volunteering to maintain special RPM 4.13 (current in all fedoras) which support that kind
of dependency if required.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
6:19 p.m.
kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I'd really like to avoid doing that if we can. We have done that in the past and it
was a big pain.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
12:26 p.m.
puiterwijk added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Well, lets see:
koji builders are fedora - fine
koji hubs are rhel7 - would need switching to fedora
rawhide/branched composers are fedora - fine
bodhi-backend01 is fedora - fine
Signing bridges are RHEL7 - would need switching
so it sounds to me like the hubs would be the main thing. Of course all the tools on
those things... koji, pungi, bodhi would need support.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
7:27 a.m.
jkurik added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This Change has been deferred to F28.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
7:29 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@puiterwijk signing might just work... but we need to try-and-see..
@kevin, when would be good time to see what breaks?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
8:54 a.m.
ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Signing bridges shouldn't care, since RPM shouldn't be processing the dependency
header information... It's handled rich deps packages so far, I imagine it can handle
this too.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
1:22 p.m.
kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@puiterwijk signing might just work... but we need to try-and-see..
@kevin, when would be good time to see what breaks?
Well, ideally we would wait for a less busy day where rawhide compose finished fine.
Then you push a package, we make sure it's signed and then fire a new rawhide compose.
If things blow up we untag it and fix them and try again later.
Possibly after flock?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
2:01 a.m.
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Possibly after flock?
Would work for me, just let me know once you are ready! :wine_glass:
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6889
2436
days inactive
2485
days old
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
17 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Dennis Gilmore -
Igor Gnatenko
-
Jan Kurik
-
Kevin Fenzi
-
Mohan Boddu
-
Neal Gompa
-
Patrick "マルタインアンドレアス" Uiterwijk