[Bug 208920] New: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop page
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208920
Summary: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop
page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: jkeating@redhat.com,kwade@redhat.com,sundaram(a)redhat.com
Currently, the compiz package needs to be installed. The instruction was
mistakenly removed from the Docs/Beats/Desktop page. Fortunately, the string is
untranslateable (being a command), so perhaps we can slip it back in to Desktop.xml:
<listitem>
<para>
<command>su -c 'yum install compiz'</command>
</para>
</listitem>
However, the package may get added in for default:
<f13> mether: we may add compiz by default in the gnome group. Trying to get an
ack from the gnome folks.
Cc:ing all the folks here to let us know what happens with that; set to block
the FC6 notes so's not to get forgotten.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 211934] New: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211934
Summary: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petrosyan(a)gmail.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
fedora-release-notes Summary says "Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" and
Description says "These are the official Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" in
both cases 5.92 should be replaced with 6.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-6-3
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qi fedora-release-notes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 206826] New: empty OMF file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206826
Summary: empty OMF file.
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: davej(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Since the last update of fedora-release-notes, updating various other packages
causes this to be spewed..
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
^
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 206671] New: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206671
Summary: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: vonbrand(a)inf.utfsm.cl
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
When updating, many packages complain about this file being empty.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4
How reproducible:
I don't know what uses this, sorry.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 206417] New: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417
Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Error is :-
[root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution
Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization.
Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead.
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set.
evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00
---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 13 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
^
OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML:
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6
Complete!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4
How reproducible:
While installing/removing any package
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install any rpm
Actual results:
Clean installation
Expected results:
Parse errors as shown above
Additional info:
Running FC6T3 - rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 206101] New: OMF errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206101
Summary: OMF errors
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: notting(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Updating : fedora-release-notes ####################### [ 8/20]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 204070] New: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204070
Summary: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wet(a)timeware.at
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Release notes from
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc5/release-notes-ISO/#id3092710
Section 8.6 Preparing for Kernel Development
tell me:
Prepare the kernel sources using the commands:
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
rpmbuild -bp --target $(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec
The kernel source tree is located in the
${HOME}/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/ directory.
This is not correct for FC5; when following the procedure the directory
.../BUILD/kernel-<version>/ contains:
# ls -p rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.17/
Config.mk linux-2.6.17.i686/ vanilla/ xen/ xen-20060708/
So I assume the kernel "sources" of a version I want to build myself are in one
these subdirectories, but this is different from the current wording of the
release notes.
The box a few lines above "Do Not Build Packages as Super-user" has the
directory (almost) correct:
~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/linux-<version>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 203594] New: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203594
Summary: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mksharma88(a)gmail.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: majain@redhat.com,relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.91-6
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
2. search for ")is"
Actual results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/)is"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/)is</a>
Expected results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/</a>) is
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 187080] New: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187080
Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: ppc64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: nag(a)uk.ibm.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: kwade(a)redhat.com
The release notes stats that IBM pSeries machines, which has the POWER5
processors, are supported - great.
pSeries machines can be used in three ways:
1) Stand alone as a SMP machine.
2) Using Logical Partitions with physical resources like real SCSI disks and
Ethernet.
3) Using Logical Partitions with virtual resources like using ibmvscsi and
ibmveth drivers.
It is not clear in the release notes which modes are supported.
I have just tried virtual resources - failed with unable to read package
metadata, failure with a reference to repodata/comps.xml from anaconda Errno 256
I have just tried with physical resources - hangs loading a DAC960 driver, which
is a RAID SCSI card.
If you clarify which modes and hardware Fedora5 has been tested on, we might
avoid many frustrations in Fedora users.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
14 years, 7 months