May 2008 - relnotes-content - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 243190] New: Relase notes imply you need to be a KDE user to use K3B

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243190 Summary: Relase notes imply you need to be a KDE user to use K3B Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f7/en_US/sn- Multimedia.html#sn-CD-DVD-Authoring-and-Burning OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allenhalsey(a)gmail.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Fedora 7 relase notes section 16.4. on CD and DVD Authoring and Burning states: "GNOME users can burn directly from the Nautilus file manager, choose the gnomebaker or graveman packages, or utilize the older xcdroast package from Fedora. KDE users can use the robust k3b package for these tasks." This incorrectly implies that you need to be a KDE user to use k3b, when, in fact, k3b is popular with many Gnome users. Similarly, GTK-based applications, like graveman, can be run within the KDE environment. It is not necessary to make a KDE versus Gnome distinction when selecting applications. Interoperability between the various X Window System desktop applications is primary goal of the freedesktop project. Allen Halsey -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

15 years, 8 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 229872] New: For F8 test1, have drop-in HTML page for Anaconda

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229872 Summary: For F8 test1, have drop-in HTML page for Anaconda Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stickster(a)gmail.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Anaconda needs a "filler" HTML page for release notes. If we can't get the one-sheet into fedora-release-notes in a timely basis, let's at least have a small note here that redirects people to the one-sheet canonical page (currently the wiki) for information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

15 years, 8 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 449060] New: release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449060 Summary: release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joshua(a)iwsp.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf... before references writing or appending to it. A reference as to why it isn't created by default might make sense here as well Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F9 release-notes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

15 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 449061] New: release-notes need to reference libflashsupport alongside flash-plugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449061 Summary: release-notes need to reference libflashsupport alongside flash-plugin Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joshua(a)iwsp.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: See http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f9/en_US/sn-Desktop.html#sn-E... The instructions here, while appreciated, fail to mention that audio for flash doesn't actually work until you *also* install libflashsupport. Could this be added please? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F9 release notes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

15 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

by postmaster＠ics-mx-02.ics.local.redhat.com

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. bradannancey(a)spacademy.org

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 998] FTP/NFS install/upgrade is unsafe, should check GPG signatures.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FTP/NFS install/upgrade is unsafe, should check GPG signatures. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998 fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 katzj(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|katzj(a)redhat.com |clumens(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com 2008-05-13 21:54 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)krp.org.uk 2008-05-28 09:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #163) > Kevin: can you test them? The i386 build works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 448280] Depreciation should be mentioned in Release Notes as well as way how to replace it with xrandr

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Depreciation should be mentioned in Release Notes as well as way how to replace it with xrandr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448280 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl(a)redhat.com 2008-05-28 07:00 EST ------- This is meant for F9 Release notes, not Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net 2008-05-27 21:07 EST ------- By the way, the .spec file changes looked fine to me. RPMs can be accessed from the koji scratch build here (click on the Descendent Task for your particular arch) to access the actual RPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=632388 Kevin: can you test them? (I'll also check on my F-8 laptop when I get home). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251 ------- Additional Comments From alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net 2008-05-27 20:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #161) > No, not based on build date and version name - and I'm pretty certain that's the > same update I checked out in comment #133 queued up since then. We'd need a > hal-info from at least 20080226, and even with that we'd need to ship some > config in pilot-link unless we get an update of the main hal package to 0.5.11. OK, I'm going to commit this now as this bug has been open far too long and it looks unlikely that we'll get the hal update any time soon. I'll first do a scratch build and post the URL to the scratch build here for Kevin (and others) to test. If that all works out, I'll submit an official build for updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content May 2008