Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228729
Summary: review of README-Accessibility for F7
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
We need to be sure to review and update (including copyright details) this file
for F7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243337
Summary: Package should require yelp for its help
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com
CC: mcepl@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org
This package uses yelp for its help. Therefore, it should require package yelp for its operation.
[Filed by a script; forgive him if he made a mistake for once.]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208920
Summary: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop
page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: jkeating@redhat.com,kwade@redhat.com,sundaram@redhat.com
Currently, the compiz package needs to be installed. The instruction was
mistakenly removed from the Docs/Beats/Desktop page. Fortunately, the string is
untranslateable (being a command), so perhaps we can slip it back in to Desktop.xml:
<listitem>
<para>
<command>su -c 'yum install compiz'</command>
</para>
</listitem>
However, the package may get added in for default:
<f13> mether: we may add compiz by default in the gnome group. Trying to get an
ack from the gnome folks.
Cc:ing all the folks here to let us know what happens with that; set to block
the FC6 notes so's not to get forgotten.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209176
Summary: RELNOTES - Create announce/release-summary/press release
for FC6
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: kwade(a)redhat.com
Tracking bug to request whats in the subject. A little late, but better than never.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237396
Summary: 'failed to load external entity' message when updating
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: lmacken(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Updating : fedora-release-notes ##################### [ 13/102]
///usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes-6.93/about/C/about-fedora.xml:6: I/O
warning : failed to load external entity
"/usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes-6.93/about/C/fdp-entities.ent"
%FDP-ENTITIES;
^
%FDP-ENTITIES;
^
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes noarch 6.93-1 development 1.0 M
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum update
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237262
Summary: about fedora missing translations
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
"About Fedora" is missing German translations.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232939
Summary: About Fedora showing up unwantedly in the menus
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
in Applications/Other...
Since the panel hardcodes it in the System menu already, we really don't want
it to show up somewhere else in the menus. Trivial patch attached.
------- Additional Comments From mclasen(a)redhat.com 2007-03-19 11:42 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=150381)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150381&action=view)
patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211934
Summary: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petrosyan(a)gmail.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
fedora-release-notes Summary says "Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" and
Description says "These are the official Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" in
both cases 5.92 should be replaced with 6.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-6-3
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qi fedora-release-notes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206826
Summary: empty OMF file.
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: davej(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Since the last update of fedora-release-notes, updating various other packages
causes this to be spewed..
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
^
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206671
Summary: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: vonbrand(a)inf.utfsm.cl
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
When updating, many packages complain about this file being empty.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4
How reproducible:
I don't know what uses this, sorry.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417
Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Error is :-
[root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution
Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization.
Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead.
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set.
evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00
---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 13 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
^
OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML:
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6
Complete!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4
How reproducible:
While installing/removing any package
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install any rpm
Actual results:
Clean installation
Expected results:
Parse errors as shown above
Additional info:
Running FC6T3 - rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206101
Summary: OMF errors
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: notting(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Updating : fedora-release-notes ####################### [ 8/20]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204070
Summary: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wet(a)timeware.at
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Release notes from
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc5/release-notes-ISO/#id3092710
Section 8.6 Preparing for Kernel Development
tell me:
Prepare the kernel sources using the commands:
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
rpmbuild -bp --target $(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec
The kernel source tree is located in the
${HOME}/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/ directory.
This is not correct for FC5; when following the procedure the directory
.../BUILD/kernel-<version>/ contains:
# ls -p rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.17/
Config.mk linux-2.6.17.i686/ vanilla/ xen/ xen-20060708/
So I assume the kernel "sources" of a version I want to build myself are in one
these subdirectories, but this is different from the current wording of the
release notes.
The box a few lines above "Do Not Build Packages as Super-user" has the
directory (almost) correct:
~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/linux-<version>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203594
Summary: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mksharma88(a)gmail.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: majain@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.91-6
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
2. search for ")is"
Actual results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/)is"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/)is</a>
Expected results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/</a>) is
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: missing section header entries in *.po
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497395
Summary: missing section header entries in *.po
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: geert.warrink(a)onsnet.nu
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I reviewed the release notes as made available by John J. McDonough at
jjmcd.fedorapeople.org.
I have translated this document into Dutch, and I have only reviewed this
Dutch translation.
Two section headers appear in the translation still containing the English
text:
5.10. File Systems
7.2. Electronic Design Automation
These two section headers cannot be translated as there no entry for these
headers in the *.po file.
Can this be corrected?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: email link in f11 release notes is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506344
Summary: email link in f11 release notes is broken
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: david.c.mores(a)baesystems.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
In section 1.5.2 the email bullet fails.
Email relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org returns:
Not Found
The requested URL /docs/release-notes/f11/en-US/relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org was
not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat) Server at localhost Port 10005
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Changes to printing beat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508832
Summary: Changes to printing beat
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: urgent
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mniranja(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Blocks: 151189
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Niranjan Mallapadi Raghavender <mniranja(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo+
Provide details here. Do not change the blocking bug.
Addition of changes of cupsd package apart from system-config-printer.
The version of cups provided with Fedora is cups-1.4 and following are the
features in general, Though there are about number of changes <br>
====Web-Interface====
*The Administration Page provides more Advanced Operations like choice of
Protocols (CUPS, LDAP) for sharing, Maximum number of
simultaneous clients , Shows Job Completed jobs
====Networking====
* CUPS now uses "Bonjour (DNS-SD)" providing mDNS(multicast DNS) which supports
Bonjour-based printer discovery
====Scheduler====
*Scheduler now adds "authenticated" policy, So that certain IPP operations can
be authenticated.On Fedora-11 the default policy is "default"
The scheduler provides "OpPolicy" directive which can be used to modify the
policy. lpadmin command can also be used to set the policy to<br>
a particular printer using <code>-o printer-op-policy</code>
*the default LogLevel is now "warn" instead of "info"
*The scheduler now supports a DefaultPaperSize directive to override the
default paper size defined by the locale or libpaper configuration
*New ErrorPolicy "retry-current-job" is added, that retries the current job
immediately
*Scheduler supports SSLOptions Directive in cupsd.conf which specifies the
network address and port to Listen for secure connections
*Scheduler now supports new "FatalErrors" Directive to determine which kind of
errors are fatal, The following kind of errors are currently recognized
none, all, browse, config (configuration syntax errors), log (log file creation
errors), permissions (file permission errors ex: certificate files and keys)
*Scheduler now passes hostname from the job was submitted as
"job-originating-host-name" to filters and back-ends
*Scheduler now includes CUPS_FILETYPE, PRINTER_INFO, and PRINTER_LOCATION
environment variables that is passed to filter or backend
*The scheduler now supports a test mode via the "-t" option, which can be used
to test the syntax of cupsd.conf.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Repeated subsection in 5.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505665
Summary: Repeated subsection in 5.9
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/
sect-Release_Notes-System_Daemons.html
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: eadmund42(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: the pm-utils subsection is repeated twice: once after
Power Management, and once after ntfs-3g
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: easy
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Visit
<http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Sy…>
2. Look at section headings
Actual results: pm-utils is repeated
Expected results: pm-utils should only be mentioned once
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Release notes refer to dlv.sc.org instead of dlv.isc.org with regard to DNSSEC Lookaside Verification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505607
Summary: Release notes refer to dlv.sc.org instead of
dlv.isc.org with regard to DNSSEC Lookaside
Verification
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/
sect-Release_Notes-Networking.html
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: eadmund42(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: Section 4.2 of the English (and possibly other
languages) release notes refers to dlv.sc.org (sc.org redirects to the Sierra
Club) instead of dlv.isc.org.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 11
How reproducible: Very; :
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to web page
<http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Ne…>
2. Look at second sentence of first paragraph: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Verification
(DLV) is also enabled with the dlv.sc.org DLV Registry.'
Actual results: dlv.sc.org
Expected results: dlv.isc.org
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Add to F11 notes: issue with hardware sensors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509561
Summary: Add to F11 notes: issue with hardware sensors
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: urgent
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: awilliam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Blocks: 151189
Classification: Fedora
There is an issue in Fedora 11 with the use of hardware sensors. It has been
explained excellently in this blog post:
http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/7932.html
by Hans de Goede. His text could be used more or less unchanged for a release
note. This issue should be added to the Fedora 11 release notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442642
Summary: Hebrew release-notes are left-justified
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: oron(a)actcom.co.il
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Some languages like Hebrew and Arabic are written Right-to-Left.
The HTML generated for the release-notes (and probably any other
docs generated from the same generation system) does not contain any
related instructions and therefore everything is wrongly justified
to the left (including numbering, indentation etc.)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora-9
How reproducible:
Generate html documentation and look at the resulting html.
Notice the numbering/bullets location and the paragraph justification.
Additional info:
1. A quick and dirty fix is to put a single line:
direction: rtl;
in the fedora.css generated file.
However, this should be done conditionally on the language.
2. A similar solution was done to the fp.o website (by ricky) and
works really good.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: fedora -11 release notes in kannada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516484
Summary: fedora -11 release notes in kannada
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: shalininarasimha(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
Was going through the fedora-11 release notes in kannada.
For 1.4 Common bugs, it has been written as "Saamaan dhoshagalu". It should
have been "Saamaanya dhoshagalu".
Sorry I don't have a language tool at hand, such that I could have given you
stuff in Kannada only.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: F12DocsTarget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500474
Summary: F12DocsTarget
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
This is a blocker to all issues regarding the F12 Release Notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Provide release notes on single page, or PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504825
Summary: Provide release notes on single page, or PDF
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rohandhruva(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
>From Fedora 11 onwards, the release notes are made with "Publican", and there
is no option at all to view the notes on a single page. I need to click on
"next" after each and every section, which is very irritating.
Please provide the notes on a single page, or in PDF format for download. If
they are already available in such formats on mirrors, please link to them on
the front page - http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f11/en-US/
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: hardware requirements fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516629
Summary: hardware requirements fix
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: solarflow99(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
the release notes falsely state the ram requirements for Fedora 11 for x86. It
should be minimum of 384MB and 512 recommended. Other archs might have to be
adjusted also. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508465
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 11 release notes EN_US
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441185
Summary: Please include Indonesian language (id)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dapidc(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Please include Indonesian language (id)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444292
Summary: Fedora 9 Pre release notes claims 2.6.24 kernel
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: cummings(a)kjchome.homeip.net
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Section 2.2.3 of the Fedora 9 Preview Release Notes claims that Fedora 9
features a 2.6.24 Linux kernel, when in fact the Fedora 9 Preview release has
been updated (via rawhide) with an 2.6.25-1.fc9 kernel
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Documentation should be changed to indicate the 2.6.25 kernel expected to be
released.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443694
Summary: Missing hard disk space requirement in release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-
notes/f9preview/en_US/sn-ArchSpecific.html#sn-
ArchSpecific-x64-hw
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jjcogliati-r1(a)yahoo.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: jjcogliati-r1(a)yahoo.com
Description of problem:
At
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f9preview/en_US/sn-ArchSpecific…
there is the text:
"The disk space requirements listed below" ...
But, there is no hard disk space requirements listed below.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version 8.92 (2008-03-17)
How reproducible:
Very. Has been a problem since at least Fedora 7.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Load up the release notes
2. Look at the hardware requirements.
3. Notice that there is no disk space given.
Actual results:
No listing of amount of disk space required.
Expected results:
Something on the order of 6 GB.
Additional info:
It would be helpful if it gave disk space requirements for a minimal, and how
much extra space the Development option, the Office and Productivity option and
the Server option add.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433953
Summary: Bug #433750
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kuznetsov.alexey(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Need update Installation issues about problems to start fedora on some kind of
hardware.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433750
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Release notes contain foreign characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472929
Summary: Release notes contain foreign characters
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/uk/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: keith.allcock(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
The release notes are filled with odd (for want of a better expression)
characters
I.e.
1.3. Зворотний зв'язок
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187080
Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note suggestion/content
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: ppc64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: nag(a)uk.ibm.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: kwade(a)redhat.com
The release notes stats that IBM pSeries machines, which has the POWER5
processors, are supported - great.
pSeries machines can be used in three ways:
1) Stand alone as a SMP machine.
2) Using Logical Partitions with physical resources like real SCSI disks and
Ethernet.
3) Using Logical Partitions with virtual resources like using ibmvscsi and
ibmveth drivers.
It is not clear in the release notes which modes are supported.
I have just tried virtual resources - failed with unable to read package
metadata, failure with a reference to repodata/comps.xml from anaconda Errno 256
I have just tried with physical resources - hangs loading a DAC960 driver, which
is a RAID SCSI card.
If you clarify which modes and hardware Fedora5 has been tested on, we might
avoid many frustrations in Fedora users.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372381
Summary: intel is the default driver
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: djuran(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Provide details here. Do not change the blocking bug.
Hello.
I've noticed that in
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-Xorg.html it's written
that i810 is the default driver. If I'm not mistaken, "intel" is the default
driver for all intel graphics cards nowadays...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Component: distribution
Eric Christensen <eric(a)christensenplace.us> has asked for
fedora_requires_release_note:
Bug 514204: Can't upgrade to newer rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514204
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998
Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|katzj(a)redhat.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> has denied fedora_requires_release_note:
Bug 156113: [PATCH] Perl is build with debugging support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156113
------- Additional Comments from Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com>
(In reply to comment #5)
> I guess that the Release notes should mention that unlike in Fedora 9--11,
perl
> in Fedora 12 is compiled without -DDEBUGGING again.
No, the fix will probably come with perl 5.10.1 in F-13.
I'm afraid we won't have a production build of perl in F-12. After all, no one
noticed for three releases of Fedora...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151189
Bug 151189 depends on bug 514153, which changed state.
Bug 514153 Summary: Update F11 release notes czech translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514153
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.