relnotes-content May 2010

relnotes-content@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
23 discussions

[Bug 206417] New: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417 Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Error is :- [root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set. evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00 ---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 13 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01 Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1] /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found ^ OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 Complete! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-5.92-4 How reproducible: While installing/removing any package Steps to Reproduce: 1. install any rpm Actual results: Clean installation Expected results: Parse errors as shown above Additional info: Running FC6T3 - rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 206101] New: OMF errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 7

[Bug 204070] New: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

[Bug 203594] New: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

[Bug 596646] New: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '10

02 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596646 Summary: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chenhuan.gt(a)gmail.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Classification: Fedora Description of problem: 在“1.1 Fedora 13 概览”中的“本发行版中的其它特性：“部分，“通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”后面的参考现在是"第 4.1 节 'Fedora 桌面'"，其实应指向“第 2 节 ‘安装注记’”。 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 998] Network install/upgrade is unsafe, should check GPG signatures.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '10

27 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998 Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akozumpl(a)redhat.com --- Comment #39 from Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-27 11:42:39 EDT --- Related: bug 588362. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '10

26 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 --- Comment #17 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2010-05-26 01:33:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > This is the particular snippet I didn't understand and which caused > rpmbuild to fail Reviewing it now it appears that perhaps some other document > was organized as index-fr.html, index-en.html, etc. The release notes aren't > like that so I was struggling trying to figure out the point of that code. Yes, as said in comment 11, that patch was obsolete by the time you tried it, no surprise it didn't work at all if the docs had been reorganized/renamed. It was made in the F-10 era. At that time it looked for files named /path/to/index-LANGCODE.html, and generated file lists like "%lang(LANGCODE) /path/to/index-LANGCODE.html" out of them, and FWIW at that time it did work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 --- Comment #16 from John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> 2010-05-25 19:17:25 EDT --- Sorry, Comment 11 wasn't very helpful. However, what I was most concerned about was the section in your earlier patch: %find_lang %{name} --with-gnome --all-name for F in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_defaultdocdir}/HTML/index-*.html ; do L=`echo ${F} | %{__sed} 's/.*\/index-$.*$\.html$/\1/'` echo "%%lang(${L}) ${F#$RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" >> html.lang done which just didn't make any sense to me. I see it is gone from your most recent patches. This is the particular snippet I didn't understand and which caused rpmbuild to fail Reviewing it now it appears that perhaps some other document was organized as index-fr.html, index-en.html, etc. The release notes aren't like that so I was struggling trying to figure out the point of that code. I believe the current specfile contains most of your patches, I'll review it to be sure we got them all. The release notes spec file is actually produced programatically, and the actual spec file might change depending on the writer's needs, but once I get all your suggestions into the script, then all documents will benefit. Sorry if I'm a little slow on the uptake here. I'm not trying to be contrary, just trying to understand. And I do appreciate your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta@iki. | |fi) | --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2010-05-25 17:43:25 EDT --- Did you read comment 11? Was there something unclear about that, or the comments in the patch files? I don't know what more information you're looking for, but here's a try: localized files should be marked with %lang where it doesn't cause other problems in order to honor people's %_install_langs settings (for example to save some space on space constrained setups such as live CD's), and for the other fixes/patches I don't know what more information I could give besides what's already in the patches' commit messages. I *did* verify that the package builds with the patches in comment 11 applied, otherwise I wouldn't have caught the one mentioned build error nor could I have posted instructions about how to avoid it. Just a guess: Have you by chance been working on adapting my original patches attached to this bug? As mentioned in comment 11, they're obsolete, and they're also marked as obsolete in this bug. Please take a look at the patch set linked to in comment 11 instead. But on the other hand, I see git has already moved on and now they'd need to be adapted/rebased manually. I'm afraid I'll need more information about whether you'd consider applying them this time, and against what you'd prefer them (git or the package structure in packages CVS tree) before spending more time on doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric(a)christensenplace.us Component|fedora-release-notes |release-notes Version|13 |devel AssignedTo|wb8rcr(a)arrl.net |relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Product|Fedora |Fedora Documentation QAContact|extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org |kwade(a)redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ville.skytta@iki. | |fi) --- Comment #14 from John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> 2010-05-25 08:11:21 EDT --- Moving this to Fedora Documentation so it doesn't get lost. As much of the patch as actually works is included in the last couple of releases, but parts of the patch fail, and since we still don't know the point of all this, we are unable to work around. NEED ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content May 2010