May 2010 - relnotes-content - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 228729] New: review of README-Accessibility for F7
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228729 Summary: review of README-Accessibility for F7 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com We need to be sure to review and update (including copyright details) this file for F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

2 9

[Bug 243337] New: Package should require yelp for its help
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243337 Summary: Package should require yelp for its help Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com CC: mcepl@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org This package uses yelp for its help. Therefore, it should require package yelp for its operation. [Filed by a script; forgive him if he made a mistake for once.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

2 4

[Bug 208920] New: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop page
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208920 Summary: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop page Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: jkeating@redhat.com,kwade@redhat.com,sundaram@redhat.com Currently, the compiz package needs to be installed. The instruction was mistakenly removed from the Docs/Beats/Desktop page. Fortunately, the string is untranslateable (being a command), so perhaps we can slip it back in to Desktop.xml: <listitem> <para> <command>su -c 'yum install compiz'</command> </para> </listitem> However, the package may get added in for default: <f13> mether: we may add compiz by default in the gnome group. Trying to get an ack from the gnome folks. Cc:ing all the folks here to let us know what happens with that; set to block the FC6 notes so's not to get forgotten. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 2

[Bug 209176] New: RELNOTES - Create announce/release-summary/press release for FC6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209176 Summary: RELNOTES - Create announce/release-summary/press release for FC6 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: kwade(a)redhat.com Tracking bug to request whats in the subject. A little late, but better than never. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 9

[Bug 237396] New: 'failed to load external entity' message when updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237396 Summary: 'failed to load external entity' message when updating Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: lmacken(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Updating : fedora-release-notes ##################### [ 13/102] ///usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes-6.93/about/C/about-fedora.xml:6: I/O warning : failed to load external entity "/usr/share/doc/fedora-release-notes-6.93/about/C/fdp-entities.ent" %FDP-ENTITIES; ^ %FDP-ENTITIES; ^ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes noarch 6.93-1 development 1.0 M Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 237262] New: about fedora missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237262 Summary: about fedora missing translations Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org "About Fedora" is missing German translations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 232939] New: About Fedora showing up unwantedly in the menus
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232939 Summary: About Fedora showing up unwantedly in the menus Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org in Applications/Other... Since the panel hardcodes it in the System menu already, we really don't want it to show up somewhere else in the menus. Trivial patch attached. ------- Additional Comments From mclasen(a)redhat.com 2007-03-19 11:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=150381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150381&action=view) patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 211934] New: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211934 Summary: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petrosyan(a)gmail.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: fedora-release-notes Summary says "Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" and Description says "These are the official Release Notes for Fedora Core 5.92" in both cases 5.92 should be replaced with 6. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-6-3 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: rpm -qi fedora-release-notes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 206826] New: empty OMF file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206826 Summary: empty OMF file. Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: davej(a)redhat.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Since the last update of fedora-release-notes, updating various other packages causes this to be spewed.. /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found ^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 206671] New: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206671 Summary: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: vonbrand(a)inf.utfsm.cl QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: When updating, many packages complain about this file being empty. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-5.92-4 How reproducible: I don't know what uses this, sorry. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 206417] New: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417 Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Error is :- [root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set. evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00 ---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 13 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01 Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1] /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found ^ OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 Complete! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-5.92-4 How reproducible: While installing/removing any package Steps to Reproduce: 1. install any rpm Actual results: Clean installation Expected results: Parse errors as shown above Additional info: Running FC6T3 - rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 206101] New: OMF errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206101 Summary: OMF errors Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: notting(a)redhat.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Updating : fedora-release-notes ####################### [ 8/20] /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found fedora-release-notes-5.92-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 204070] New: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204070 Summary: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wet(a)timeware.at QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Release notes from http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc5/release-notes-ISO/#id3092710 Section 8.6 Preparing for Kernel Development tell me: Prepare the kernel sources using the commands: cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS rpmbuild -bp --target $(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec The kernel source tree is located in the ${HOME}/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/ directory. This is not correct for FC5; when following the procedure the directory .../BUILD/kernel-<version>/ contains: # ls -p rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.17/ Config.mk linux-2.6.17.i686/ vanilla/ xen/ xen-20060708/ So I assume the kernel "sources" of a version I want to build myself are in one these subdirectories, but this is different from the current wording of the release notes. The box a few lines above "Do Not Build Packages as Super-user" has the directory (almost) correct: ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/linux-<version> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 203594] New: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203594 Summary: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html Product: Fedora Core Version: test2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mksharma88(a)gmail.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: majain@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-5.91-6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html 2. search for ")is" Actual results: [root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n 381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/)is" target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/)is</a> Expected results: [root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n 381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/" target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/</a>) is Additional info: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 596646] New: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '10

03 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596646 Summary: “通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”的参考链接错 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chenhuan.gt(a)gmail.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Classification: Fedora Description of problem: 在“1.1 Fedora 13 概览”中的“本发行版中的其它特性：“部分，“通过互联网安装Fedora的新方法”后面的参考现在是"第 4.1 节 'Fedora 桌面'"，其实应指向“第 2 节 ‘安装注记’”。 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 998] Network install/upgrade is unsafe, should check GPG signatures.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '10

27 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998 Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akozumpl(a)redhat.com --- Comment #39 from Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-27 11:42:39 EDT --- Related: bug 588362. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '10

26 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 --- Comment #17 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2010-05-26 01:33:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > This is the particular snippet I didn't understand and which caused > rpmbuild to fail Reviewing it now it appears that perhaps some other document > was organized as index-fr.html, index-en.html, etc. The release notes aren't > like that so I was struggling trying to figure out the point of that code. Yes, as said in comment 11, that patch was obsolete by the time you tried it, no surprise it didn't work at all if the docs had been reorganized/renamed. It was made in the F-10 era. At that time it looked for files named /path/to/index-LANGCODE.html, and generated file lists like "%lang(LANGCODE) /path/to/index-LANGCODE.html" out of them, and FWIW at that time it did work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 --- Comment #16 from John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> 2010-05-25 19:17:25 EDT --- Sorry, Comment 11 wasn't very helpful. However, what I was most concerned about was the section in your earlier patch: %find_lang %{name} --with-gnome --all-name for F in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_defaultdocdir}/HTML/index-*.html ; do L=`echo ${F} | %{__sed} 's/.*\/index-$.*$\.html$/\1/'` echo "%%lang(${L}) ${F#$RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" >> html.lang done which just didn't make any sense to me. I see it is gone from your most recent patches. This is the particular snippet I didn't understand and which caused rpmbuild to fail Reviewing it now it appears that perhaps some other document was organized as index-fr.html, index-en.html, etc. The release notes aren't like that so I was struggling trying to figure out the point of that code. I believe the current specfile contains most of your patches, I'll review it to be sure we got them all. The release notes spec file is actually produced programatically, and the actual spec file might change depending on the writer's needs, but once I get all your suggestions into the script, then all documents will benefit. Sorry if I'm a little slow on the uptake here. I'm not trying to be contrary, just trying to understand. And I do appreciate your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta@iki. | |fi) | --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2010-05-25 17:43:25 EDT --- Did you read comment 11? Was there something unclear about that, or the comments in the patch files? I don't know what more information you're looking for, but here's a try: localized files should be marked with %lang where it doesn't cause other problems in order to honor people's %_install_langs settings (for example to save some space on space constrained setups such as live CD's), and for the other fixes/patches I don't know what more information I could give besides what's already in the patches' commit messages. I *did* verify that the package builds with the patches in comment 11 applied, otherwise I wouldn't have caught the one mentioned build error nor could I have posted instructions about how to avoid it. Just a guess: Have you by chance been working on adapting my original patches attached to this bug? As mentioned in comment 11, they're obsolete, and they're also marked as obsolete in this bug. Please take a look at the patch set linked to in comment 11 instead. But on the other hand, I see git has already moved on and now they'd need to be adapted/rebased manually. I'm afraid I'll need more information about whether you'd consider applying them this time, and against what you'd prefer them (git or the package structure in packages CVS tree) before spending more time on doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 482947] Mark localized files with %lang, fix minor packaging issues
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '10

25 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482947 John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric(a)christensenplace.us Component|fedora-release-notes |release-notes Version|13 |devel AssignedTo|wb8rcr(a)arrl.net |relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Product|Fedora |Fedora Documentation QAContact|extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org |kwade(a)redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ville.skytta@iki. | |fi) --- Comment #14 from John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> 2010-05-25 08:11:21 EDT --- Moving this to Fedora Documentation so it doesn't get lost. As much of the patch as actually works is included in the last couple of releases, but parts of the patch fail, and since we still don't know the point of all this, we are unable to work around. NEED ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 594466] New: Please remove "5.1.2. modprobe Whitelist"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 May '10

20 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please remove "5.1.2. modprobe Whitelist" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594466 Summary: Please remove "5.1.2. modprobe Whitelist" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Hello, can you please remove the "modprobe whitelist" section from F13 release notes? The feature was never approved for F13 nor implemented. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 591694] Fedora 13 release notes should mention nautilus' removal of button to toggle between path as buttons and path as text
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 May '10

20 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591694 Eric Christensen <eric(a)christensenplace.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org |wb8rcr(a)arrl.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 590492] link error (kernelnewbies changelog)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 May '10

17 May '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590492 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-05-17 15:06:53 EDT --- fedora-release-notes-13.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content May 2010