relnotes-content October 2012

relnotes-content@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
21 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Bug 228729] New: review of README-Accessibility for F7
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

2 9

[Bug 243337] New: Package should require yelp for its help
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

2 4

[Bug 828745] New: f17 release note 3.4.7 title should be "vmpk", not "vpmk".
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '13

18 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828745 Bug ID: 828745 QA Contact: kwade(a)redhat.com Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: f17 release note 3.4.7 title should be "vmpk", not "vpmk". Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: release-notes Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: f17 release note 3.4.7 title should be "vmpk", not "vpmk". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 864939] New: Note that systemctl now assumes ".service"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '13

14 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864939 Bug ID: 864939 Blocks: 151189 (fc-relnotes-traqr) QA Contact: kwade(a)redhat.com Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Note that systemctl now assumes ".service" Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: mattdm(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: release-notes Product: Fedora Documentation Provide details here. Do not change the blocking bug. Previously, systemd required services to have .service appended in systemctl commands; $ sudo systemctl restart myservice $ Failed to issue method call: Unit name myservice is not valid. -bash: Failed: command not found $ sudo systemctl restart myservice.service [okay] Starting with F18, if there is no dot suffix, systemctl will assume you meant a service and just work. This should go in the release notes, because it's a common end-user complaint about the systemctl user interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 826255] New: "home" points to the wrong page
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '13

10 Feb '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826255 Bug ID: 826255 QA Contact: kwade(a)redhat.com Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: "home" points to the wrong page Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: cpanceac(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: release-notes Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: on http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… and http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… , the "Home" button (at bottom of page) points to the same link as "Next", instead of http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Release_Notes/index.html Also, on the last two of the above pages, "Up" button points to the same link as "Previous" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 208920] New: add compiz installation instructions back to Desktop page
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 2

[Bug 209176] New: RELNOTES - Create announce/release-summary/press release for FC6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209176 Summary: RELNOTES - Create announce/release-summary/press release for FC6 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: kwade(a)redhat.com Tracking bug to request whats in the subject. A little late, but better than never. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 9

[Bug 237396] New: 'failed to load external entity' message when updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 4

[Bug 237262] New: about fedora missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 8

[Bug 232939] New: About Fedora showing up unwantedly in the menus
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 2

[Bug 211934] New: wrong Summary and Description for fedora-release-notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

[Bug 206826] New: empty OMF file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 2

[Bug 206671] New: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf is empty
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

[Bug 206417] New: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417 Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm Error is :- [root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set. evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00 ---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 13 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01 Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1] /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag expected, '<' not found ^ OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML: /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 Complete! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora-release-notes-5.92-4 How reproducible: While installing/removing any package Steps to Reproduce: 1. install any rpm Actual results: Clean installation Expected results: Parse errors as shown above Additional info: Running FC6T3 - rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 206101] New: OMF errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 7

[Bug 204070] New: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

[Bug 203594] New: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jan '13

09 Jan '13

1 3

fedora_requires_release_note requested: [Bug 870317] grub2-efi: it failed to switch into *EDIT* mode on uefi machine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Oct '12

26 Oct '12

Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: grub2 Zhouping Liu <zliu(a)redhat.com> has asked for fedora_requires_release_note: Bug 870317: grub2-efi: it failed to switch into *EDIT* mode on uefi machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870317 ------- Additional Comments from Zhouping Liu <zliu(a)redhat.com> Description of problem: when booting process step on grub2 screen, the grub can allow us to choose which kernel you use, and edit the kernel boot parameters if need. but it failed when I enter 'e' character to try to change some info. the screen does not contain any words, and it can't return back to the grub menu screen using enter 'Esc' button. the system didn't have any response, what I only can do is to enter 'Ctrl+Alt+Delete' to reboot. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa | grep grub grub2-tools-2.00-9.fc18.x86_64 grub2-efi-2.00-9.fc18.x86_64 grubby-8.20-1.fc18.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. get a uefi machine 2. install fedora18 with Desktop 3. change the kernel parameter during booting in grub menu Actual results: can't switch into grub EDIT mode Expected results: no such above issue

1 0

fedora_requires_release_note requested: [Bug 867812] Fedora 17 - ufoai 2.4-1 Needs data & server 2.4 but only 2.3.1-1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Oct '12

18 Oct '12

Product: Fedora Version: 17 Component: PackageKit Evgenij Kutyavin <tukenavrich(a)gmail.com> has asked for fedora_requires_release_note: Bug 867812: Fedora 17 - ufoai 2.4-1 Needs data & server 2.4 but only 2.3.1-1 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867812 ------- Additional Comments from Evgenij Kutyavin <tukenavrich(a)gmail.com> Running Fedora 17 XFCE, and a search in my Apper shows ufoai 2.4-1.fc17 available. But it requires ufoai-data 2.4 & ufoai-data-server 2.4, and only version 2.3.1-1 is available to me. What should I do?

1 0

[Bug 151189] Fedora release notes tracker bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Oct '12

10 Oct '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151189 Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |864939 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 859373] Danger in dual booting Windows 8 and Linux
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '12

01 Oct '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859373 Kamil Páral <kparal(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kparal(a)redhat.com Component|release-notes |ntfs-3g Version|devel |rawhide Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CANTFIX Assignee|relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org |tcallawa(a)redhat.com Product|Fedora Documentation |Fedora QA Contact|kwade(a)redhat.com |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #5 from Kamil Páral <kparal(a)redhat.com> --- I believe CANTFIX resolution is more appropriate, it says that even though we documented the issue, it still persists and we can't really do much about it. (Otherwise someone could see just the "closed fixed" status and assume this has been fixed somehow). Changing resolution and also component back to ntfs-3g. However, I believe there could be ways to improve the situation. We could detect whether Win 8 is present on the computer, and if we mount NTFS partition in such case, we could force chkdsk to be run on the next Windows boot. That would make sure user data are not lost. The question is whether we can do this only if fast-restart feature is turned on (whether we can detect that somehow), otherwise this solution could be a bit annoying. Another solution is that the installer could try to disable fast-restart feature if it detects Win 8 (again, if this is possible at all). These are wild guesses, I'm not the expert here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content October 2012