Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206417
Summary: Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: majain(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: aalam@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Parser error while installing or removing any rpm
Error is :-
[root@host182 packages]# yum install evolution
Deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE during plugin initialization.
Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead.
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Downloading header for evolution to pack into transaction set.
evolution-2.8.0-1.fc6.i38 100% |=========================| 124 kB 00:00
---> Package evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
evolution i386 2.8.0-1.fc6 local-development 13 M
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 13 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): evolution-2.8.0-1. 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:01
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
Installing: evolution ######################### [1/1]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
^
OMF file does not exist, is not readable, or is not well-formed XML:
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Unable to register /usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf
Installed: evolution.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc6
Complete!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4
How reproducible:
While installing/removing any package
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install any rpm
Actual results:
Clean installation
Expected results:
Parse errors as shown above
Additional info:
Running FC6T3 - rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206101
Summary: OMF errors
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: notting(a)redhat.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Updating : fedora-release-notes ####################### [ 8/20]
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Document is empty
^
/usr/share/omf/about-fedora/about-fedora-C.omf:1: parser error : Start tag
expected, '<' not found
fedora-release-notes-5.92-4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204070
Summary: Incorrect instructions to rebuild a fedora kernel
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: i686
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wet(a)timeware.at
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Release notes from
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc5/release-notes-ISO/#id3092710
Section 8.6 Preparing for Kernel Development
tell me:
Prepare the kernel sources using the commands:
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
rpmbuild -bp --target $(uname -m) kernel-2.6.spec
The kernel source tree is located in the
${HOME}/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/ directory.
This is not correct for FC5; when following the procedure the directory
.../BUILD/kernel-<version>/ contains:
# ls -p rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.17/
Config.mk linux-2.6.17.i686/ vanilla/ xen/ xen-20060708/
So I assume the kernel "sources" of a version I want to build myself are in one
these subdirectories, but this is different from the current wording of the
release notes.
The box a few lines above "Do Not Build Packages as Super-user" has the
directory (almost) correct:
~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-<version>/linux-<version>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203594
Summary: Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: fedora-release-notes
AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mksharma88(a)gmail.com
QAContact: qa-dept-list(a)redhat.com
CC: majain@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Mistake in /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fedora-release-notes-5.91-6
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
2. search for ")is"
Actual results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/)is"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/)is</a>
Expected results:
[root@Manish HTML]# cat index.html | grep ")is" -n
381: (<a href="http://www.scim-im.org/"
target="_top">http://www.scim-im.org/</a>) is
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Typos and broken formatting in Amateur Radio and Scientific and Technical sections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817553
Summary: Typos and broken formatting in Amateur Radio and
Scientific and Technical sections
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: yurchor(a)ukr.net
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 581186
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=581186
Patch to fix the typos
Description of problem: Some minor typos are left in two F17 Release Notes
sections.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): git master
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open files from the patch attached in your favorite text editor.
Actual results:
Typos, broken link and word puzzle in list
Expected results:
Nice and typo-free docs.
Additional info:
Sorry for not noticing this earlier (I just almost finished the translation and
thus reading this ;). Thanks for fixing the docs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Typos and broken links in Release Notes to Beta F17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817295
Summary: Typos and broken links in Release Notes to Beta F17
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: yurchor(a)ukr.net
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 580993
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=580993
Patch to fix the typos and links
Description of problem: Git master of Fedora 17 Release Notes contains typos
and broken links to the projects pages.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): git master
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
Open the files from the patch attached in text editor of your choice.
Actual results:
Typos, broken links due to conversion script
Expected results:
No typos, non-404 libks
Additional info:
Thanks for correcting these typos and links in the F17 Release Notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: F17 Beta release announcement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814668
Summary: F17 Beta release announcement
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bioinfornatics(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
they are nothing about the D feature
little text to enhanced
About D programming update to 2.058, in more fedora ship now several D
libraries: gtkd, derelict, phobos, tango..
already added into
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F17_Beta_release_announcement#Features
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] make firewalld less developer-centric, proofread and add some examples
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809159
Summary: [PATCH] make firewalld less developer-centric,
proofread and add some examples
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 574546
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=574546
patch against f17 branch in release-notes.git
The firewalld section looks like a direct copy from the feature page and
contains stuff about comps, etc. that really isn't useful to end users. It
also contains outdated test instructions that are pretty useless now that
firewalld is default.
The attached patch cleans it up a bit, proofreading where necessary and
converting the "testing" section to some examples of how to control firewalld
from the command line, with examples on how to work directly with port numbers
added (I think that's a fairly common task).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] proofreading and minor improvements to KDE section
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809163
Summary: [PATCH] proofreading and minor improvements to KDE
section
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 574551
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=574551
patch against f17 branch in release-notes.git
Just some minor improvements to the KDE section, including marking up
application names with DocBook consistently.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.