https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158767
Bug ID: 1158767
Summary: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are
not verified anymore
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tmraz(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr)
OpenSSL was patched to disallow verification of certificates that are signed
with MD5 algorithm. The use of MD5 hash algorithm for certificate signatures is
now considered as insecure and thus all the main crypto libraries in Fedora
were patched to reject such certificates.
Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not present on public https web
sites anymore but they can be still in use on private networks or used for
authentication on openvpn based VPNs such as in bug 1157260. It is highly
recommended to replace such certificates with new ones signed with SHA256 or at
least SHA1. As a temporary measure the OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY environment
variable can be set to allow verification of certificates signed with MD5
algorithm.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083
[Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001349
Bug ID: 1001349
Summary: NetworkManager Bridging Support
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, psimerda(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998568
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998568 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bridging Support
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBridging
NetworkManager should be able to configure bridge interfaces with commonly used
options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without
disrupting their operation.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060216
Bug ID: 1060216
Summary: RELNOTES - Summarize the release note
suggestion/content
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: limburgher(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr)
gpodder is being upgraded from 2.20.3 to 3.5.2. There is a configuration and
date storage change between these versions. After upgrading the RPM, any user
on the system who uses gpodder, prior to opening it, should run
/usr/bin/gpodder-migrate2tres, which will migrate the user's data and
configuration to the new format, including all subscribed feeds and downloaded
podcasts.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083
[Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150394
Bug ID: 1150394
Summary: Please update I18n Documentation Beat for Fedora 21
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
We recently update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat for
google-noto-fonts which added 44 new subpackages to cover Unicode.
Please update it to your latest notes.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Not updated
Expected results:
Should have latest Documentation_I18n_Beat
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: supybot
Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> has granted fedora_requires_release_note:
Bug 1183385: Update supybot Requires for python-dateutil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183385
--- Comment #1 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> ---
The latest commit to dateutil has exactly one change to setup.py, to amend
dateutil requires to !=2.0 - and the master branch is also not bundling
dateutil any longer:
commit 2fda75e1b27235c7037606cfdbd9ec22f9172615
Author: James McCoy <vega.james(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu Jan 1 14:51:34 2015 -0500
Allow >= 2.0 versions of python-dateutil
Signed-off-by: James McCoy <vega.james(a)gmail.com>
It would be nice to have confirmation about individual supybot plugins, but it
seems safe to infer that upstream is aware of the issues at hand and
comfortable with dateutil as long as it is py2 friendly. I'm flagging for a
release note so that users of myriad supybot plugin users will get some signal.
Also, nothing in the supybot sources itself is actually importing dateutil -
it's only there for the benefit of plugins.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190810
Bug ID: 1190810
Summary: Add release note indicating that prelink will no
longer be installed by default
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rocketraman(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
For Fedora 21+ it appears prelink is no longer installed by default. This
should be documented for upgraders, so that they can choose to uninstall
prelink if they wish to track a "fresh install" more closely.
References:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1183https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184712#c20
Ideally, fedup should notify upgraders of these types of changes at upgrade
time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.