On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tom Callaway <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tcallawa@redhat.com" target="_blank">tcallawa@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>This looks promising! I&#39;m going to have to rename the namespacing for<br>
this package (and patch all dependent ROS bits to use it) to avoid<br>
conflicting with the &quot;normal&quot; pcl, but at least it should get me moving<br>
again.<br><br>
</blockquote></div><br><div>Is the goal to eventually get ros to play nice with system-wide libraries and apps?  We already have a lot of ros dependencies packaged or on the way (bullet, pcl, ompl, openni, gazebo, etc).  The motivations section of REP 122[1] indicates that upstream is interested in building ROS against standalone versions of system libraries, we may want to keep an eye on that as ros packages are submitted for review.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Rich</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://ros.org/reps/rep-0122.html">http://ros.org/reps/rep-0122.html</a></div>