ruby-sig March 2013

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
16 discussions

Puppet and Ruby 2.0
by Michael Stahnke 15 Mar '13

15 Mar '13

What is the date to get a newer Puppet into F19? Our master branch support Ruby 2.0.0 but we haven't cut a release from master for a while. (It would likely be Puppet 3.2.0). Puppet Labs probably won't move their entire release cycle for this, but I can inform them and have the Puppet core team make a good decision. stahnma

3 6

Tilt 1.3.5 upgrade
by Dan Allen 15 Mar '13

15 Mar '13

Vít, I noticed that the Tilt package has been upgraded to 1.3.5 in rawhide. Would it be possible to get this update pushed to F18 (and perhaps F17 too)? Tilt 1.3.5 has integration with the recently packaged Asciidoctor gem and is a central piece for the packaging and usage of Awestruct. Thanks, -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

2 5

Re: ruby 2 question
by Mamoru TASAKA 14 Mar '13

14 Mar '13

Hello: Orion Poplawski wrote, at 03/14/2013 07:58 AM +9:00: > I get the following build (actually install) error building mysql-ruby: > > Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.D2sqcQ > + umask 022 > + cd /builddir/build/BUILD > + '[' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 '!=' / ']' > + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 > ++ dirname /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 > + mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT > + mkdir /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 > + cd mysql-ruby-2.8.2 > + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 > + env DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386 make install > make: *** No rule to make target `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ruby-mysql-2.8.2-9.fc20.i386/usr/include/ruby.h', needed by `mysql.o'. Stop. > > > What the heck? mysql-ruby does nothing but: > > mysql.c:#include <ruby.h> > Well, this is actually mkmf.rb creating somewhat broken Makefile (from ruby 2.0.0). You can workaround this with something like make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} ruby_headers= ... but this is annoying. Orion, would you file a ticket? Vít, any idea? (perhaps lib/mkmf.rb or tool/mkconfig.rb or so needs fixing) Regards, Mamoru

1 0

Proper F18 & F19 spec notation
by Troy Dawson 13 Mar '13

13 Mar '13

Hi All, With the new F19 guidelines now in effect, I'm seeing I have lots of broken dependencies that want ruby(abi) and I'm in the middle of fixing them up. I can do something simple like. %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19 BuildRequires: ruby(release) >= %{rubyabi} %else BuildRequires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi} %endif But that just feels sorta hackish. I've looked through emails and the Guidelines, but I can't find an official way for your spec files to work with both F19, F18, and sometimes EPEL6. Am I missing something, or am I doing it right above. Thanks Troy

2 3

Ruby 2.0 in F19/Rawhide
by Vít Ondruch 12 Mar '13

12 Mar '13

Hi everybody, Ruby 2.0 just landed in F19/Rawhide [1]. Since the rebuild was not as fast as one would wish, there will be probably plenty of broken dependencies. I kindly ask you for patience or better for help with fixing any remaining issues. Just rebuild is unfortunately not enough. Please come to Ruby-SIG ML to discuss any issues or ping me on freenode (vondruch). Thank you Vít [1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5463#comment:4

1 0

package missing dependencies
by Alejandro Perez 11 Mar '13

11 Mar '13

Hello list, I wanted to upgrade on of my package and read the packaging guidelines for f19 which take out ruby(abi) requirements in favor for ruby(release) but I'm getting this message rubygem-sequel has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: rubygem-sequel-3.45.0-1.fc19.noarch requires ruby(release) Please advice. thanks

3 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig March 2013