Use rubygem(foo) or rubygem-foo
by Achilleas Pipinellis
I know that both result to the same thing (if I remember correctly I had
asked Vit about this in IRC), but I have forgotten their real difference.
My attention got caught by a comment Josef made in one of his reviews
[0], saying that rubygem-foo is the new syntax. If that's the case, I
would like to propose 2 changes:
a) A reference in the wiki
b) An implementation for gem2rpm
I guess b) could be fairly easy by changing the templates.
By starting with these steps, there will be a push to use the new syntax
from now on. What do you think?
[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979749#c2
--
FAS : axilleas
GPG : 0xABF99BE5
Blog: http://axilleas.me
9 years, 6 months
License changes
by Josef Stribny
Hi rubyists,
I am just letting you know I've fixed licences for the following packages:
rubygem-rack to MIT and (Ruby or BSD)
rubygem-rails-doc to MIT and (MIT or GPL+)
rubygem-railties to MIT
rubygem-thread_safe to ASL 2.0 and Public Domain
rubygem-erubis-doc to MIT and BSD
rubygem-i18n to MIT and (BSD or Ruby)
rubygem-jquery-rails to MIT
rubygem-diff-lcs to (GPLv2+ or Artistic or MIT) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic or Ruby or BSD) and (Artistic or Ruby or BSD)*
Thanks goes to Vit, who spotted them.
Best Regards
Josef
* Will do when I get commit rights.
9 years, 7 months
