July 2015 - ruby-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Vít Ondruch

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

3 years, 5 months

2
3
0 / 0

Ruby 2.3

by Vít Ondruch

Hi everybody, I needed to check something in development version of Ruby today, so it was good opportunity to prepare updated package with the latest bits. I'll keep updating the sources in dist git private branch [1]. This should be the scratch build (if it succeeds): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8810288 As always, let me know if you encounter any issues. Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.3

3 years, 10 months

3
20
0 / 0

Self Introduction Axel Delahaye

by Delahaye Axel

Hello everyone, I'm a computer science enginner from France. I'm in fond of computer science since my childhood. I discover Linux and Opensource in 2008 when I join the University Institute of Technology of Lille. Since this day, I try a large number of Linux distributions and I very like the opensource philosophy. I now use Fedora as personal use distribution. Anyway, today I work in Software engineering company and we use RedHat and CentOS. For our needs, we also use the epel repository and we think about contribute to this repo. First we would like to use the rubygem-bundler package from epel6 but at this time it is in testing because of the rubygem-thor dependency error I test rebuild rubygem-thor from fedora21 with epel-6-x86_64 mock profile and it works. I'm in touch with Mo Morsi who is maintainer of rubygem-thor and the builder of rubygem-bundler in epel-testing 6. So I'll send request for commit rights to the http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-thor.git/ and push to the el6 branch. I hope you now know more about me and I hope I can help you to purpose more and maintained packages Axel Delahaye ________________________________ Ce message et les pi?ces jointes sont confidentiels et r?serv?s ? l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut ?galement ?tre prot?g? par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir imm?diatement l'exp?diteur et de le d?truire. L'int?grit? du message ne pouvant ?tre assur?e sur Internet, la responsabilit? de Worldline ne pourra ?tre recherch?e quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'exp?diteur ne donne aucune garantie ? cet ?gard et sa responsabilit? ne saurait ?tre recherch?e pour tout dommage r?sultant d'un virus transmis. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.

4 years, 3 months

2
1
0 / 0

Introduction and Rack update to 4.2.3

by Sourav Moitra

Hello everyone, I am Student of Bachelor of Engineering, stream Information Technology at University Institute of Technology, Burdwan. I am a ruby enthusiast. I have done some projects on Rails with amahi.org. I am trying to update rack to latest 1.6.4 so that rails could be updated to latest 4.2.3 in EPEL. Regards Sourav Moitra

4 years, 3 months

2
1
0 / 0

dnf, jruby, and mock

by Ken Dreyer

mock with dnf pulls in jruby to satisfy "Requires: ruby(release)" on Rawhide. I've found that several (all?) of my local Rawhide mock builds fail due to jruby issues. This makes maintaining gem packages pretty tedious, and breaks fedora-review runs, etc. Can we remove the "Provides: ruby(release)" from Fedora's jruby in F23? That seems like it would be easier than switching all rubygem packages that FTBFS to "Require: ruby-mri", and besides, it often it is not my noarch gem itself that breaks with jruby, but some other build dependency somewhere in the chain. I think it makes sense to just remove the virtual provide from jruby until jruby is more stable. - Ken

4 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

Action needed - mass rebuild FTBFS

by Vít Ondruch

Hi all, There is plenty of packages which failed to build during F23 mass rebuild: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f23-failures.html If I counted correctly, there is currently 93 ruby packages failing out of 567 failing packages in total. IOW, it is more then 16 % currently failing packages. That is a lot. So is there any volunteer who would help fixing this bugs? The typical issue is due to changes in testing frameworks in recent Ruby, so these are typically easyfixes. In case you have updated SRPM, please just send me a link and I can do official build for Fedora. Thanks Vít

4 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig July 2015