ruby-sig November 2024

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
6 discussions

Ruby 3.4
by Vít Ondruch 06 Dec '24

06 Dec '24

Hi everybody, It is the time of the year to look at upcoming version of Ruby. Therefore I have opened PR with the changes: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/196 and here is the (running) scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125191137 As already done previously, the PR is opened from my fork, so I'll be able to rebase it and pick some interesting bits into stable branches. I'll also push this branch into the official repo right before merge back into Rawhide to preserve the history. And here are some interesting bits I have noticed: * By far the biggest change are the unbundled default gems. While they are mostly kept in the `bundled-gems` subpackage, it grown significantly. I try to keep the file lists very similar to what would be the gem2rpm output. * The other thing is that Ruby upstream for some unknown reason decide to put ruby executable into `libexec` directory, but not only that. There is also `bin` directory nested under. That is quite non-standard place IMHO, therefore I have reverted the change back to the previous location and I hope that upstream will change their mind (or at least provide some reasoning). * From other changes, please note that the Prism parser is now used by default. I hope it won't have any compatibility impact, but who knows. I am not aware of anything else. As always, please give the Ruby 3.4 some testing and looking forward to your feedback. Cheers, Vít

3 25

SPDX Status for Rubygems in Fedora as of 2024-11-21
by Jarek Prokop 21 Nov '24

21 Nov '24

Hi all, latest SPDX status of Rubygems. Regards, Jarek * Total rubygems in Fedora: 446 * Excluded gems: rubygem-krb5-auth rubygem-rgen rubygem-net-irc * Total rubygems checked: 440 * Fedora License field and gem2rpm license match and license-validate succeeds: 299/440 * license-validate says they are OK SPDX, but licenses may or may not match between Fedora and upstream: 418/440 * license-validate with converted conjunctions: 418/440 * Action required: 1/440 Packages that need to convert to valid SPDX: rubygem-, fedora_license rubygem-rdoc,GPL-2.0 AND Ruby AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.5 AND OFL-1.1-RFN Packages that contain LicenseRef-Callaway-.* (and should be reviewed and converted to SPDX): rubygem-, fedora_license rubygem-ansi, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-bcrypt, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-Public-Domain AND ISC rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf,LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND ISC rubygem-cookiejar, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-hashery, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-hiredis, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-idn, Apache-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-macaddr, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-marcel, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND Apache-2.0 rubygem-narray, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND Ruby rubygem-ncursesw, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-open4, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD OR Ruby rubygem-rack, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-rchardet, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2 rubygem-rmail, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-ruby-libvirt,LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-sassc-rails, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL rubygem-scanf, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-uuid, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT OR LicenseRef-Callaway-CC-BY-SA rubygem-xmlrpc, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD Package author list: package, owner(, other contributors) rubygem-ansi: stevetraylen rubygem-bcrypt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf: jackorp, pvalena rubygem-cookiejar: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-hashery: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-hiredis: vondruch, pvalena, tdawson rubygem-idn: spstarr, tdawson rubygem-macaddr: valtri rubygem-marcel: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-narray: besser82 rubygem-ncursesw: dcallagh rubygem-open4: vondruch, tdawson rubygem-rack: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, tdawson rubygem-rchardet: stevetraylen rubygem-rdoc: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig rubygem-rmail: dcallagh rubygem-ruby-libvirt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, clalance, tdawson rubygem-sassc-rails: vondruch, pvalena rubygem-scanf: ekohl, brandfbb rubygem-uuid: valtri rubygem-xmlrpc: jackorp, pvalena

1 0

Ruby 3.4 change proposal
by Vít Ondruch 20 Nov '24

20 Nov '24

Hi Rubyists, The release of Ruby 3.4 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild after Christmas, I have prepared the Ruby 3.4 change proposal [1]. It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any controversy (it is mostly copy paste of Ruby 3.3 change [2]). But anyway, please review and let me know if you have any concerns (or feel free to address them in the proposal). Also, I wonder if somebody wants to join me as an owner? Mamoru? You have been very helpful with this effort. Vít P.S. This is mostly copy of my email from last year. Trying to save my energy for fixing the remaining compatibility issues ;) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.4 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.3

2 2

Fwd: [Git] mtasaka pushed to rpms/rubygem-em-socksify (rawhide). "also add Requires for rubygem(base64)"
by Vít Ondruch 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

Hi Mamoru, I have just noticed this commit and I wonder if you considered modifying the .gemspec instead: ~~~ %gemspec_add_dep -g base64 ~~~ I think this will be needed for project using Bundler. I realize that modifying .gemspec has its own side-effects, though. Vít -------- Přeposlaná zpráva -------- Předmět: [Git] mtasaka pushed to rpms/rubygem-em-socksify (rawhide). "also add Requires for rubygem(base64)" Datum: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 06:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Od: Fedora Notifications <notifications(a)fedoraproject.org> Komu: vondruch(a)redhat.com From 0372de0e7687c836b9a5afb06d2f72a2edd6cb36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: 2024-11-11T15:52:01+09:00 Subject: also add Requires for rubygem(base64) also add Requires for rubygem(base64) --- diff --git a/rubygem-em-socksify.spec b/rubygem-em-socksify.spec index 4a16de4..4301ddd 100644 --- a/rubygem-em-socksify.spec +++ b/rubygem-em-socksify.spec @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: rubygem-%{gem_name} Version: 0.3.0 -Release: 28%{?dist} +Release: 29%{?dist} Summary: Transparent proxy support for any EventMachine protocol License: MIT URL: https://github.com/igrigorik/em-socksify @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Source1: MIT-LICENSE BuildRequires: ruby(release) BuildRequires: rubygems-devel BuildRequires: rubygem(base64) +Requires: rubygem(base64) BuildArch: noarch %if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} Requires: ruby(release) @@ -72,8 +73,8 @@ cp -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{gem_instdir}/ %{gem_instdir}/em-socksify.gemspec %changelog -* Mon Nov 11 2024 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.3.0-28 -- Add BR: rubygem(base64) explicitly for ruby34 +* Mon Nov 11 2024 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.3.0-29 +- Add dependency for rubygem(base64) explicitly for ruby34 * Fri Jul 19 2024 Fedora Release Engineering <releng(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.3.0-27 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Mass_Rebuild https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-em-socksify/c/0372de0e7687c836b9… -- Sent by Fedora Notifications:https://notifications.fedoraproject.org/rules/93

1 0

SPDX Status for Rubygems in Fedora as of 2024-11-06
by Jarek Prokop 06 Nov '24

06 Nov '24

Hi, I am back with a new report of SPDX of rubygems in Fedora, almost all gems were converted automatically to have LcienseRef-Callaway-* in License: field, review of the gems' licensing and replacing those with a proper SPDX license is strongly recommended. Regards, Jarek * Total rubygems in Fedora: 446 * Excluded gems: rubygem-krb5-auth rubygem-rgen rubygem-net-irc * Total rubygems checked: 440 * Fedora License field and gem2rpm license match and license-validate succeeds: 299/440 * license-validate says they are OK SPDX, but licenses may or may not match between Fedora and upstream: 418/440 * license-validate with converted conjunctions: 418/440 * Action required: 1/440 Packages that need to convert to valid SPDX: rubygem-, fedora_license rubygem-rdoc,GPL-2.0 AND Ruby AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.5 AND OFL-1.1-RFN Packages that contain LicenseRef-Callaway-.* (and should be reviewed and converted to SPDX): rubygem-, fedora_license rubygem-ansi, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-bcrypt, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-Public-Domain AND ISC rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf,LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND ISC rubygem-cookiejar, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-hashery, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-hiredis, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-idn, Apache-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-macaddr, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-marcel, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND Apache-2.0 rubygem-narray, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND Ruby rubygem-ncursesw, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-open4, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD OR Ruby rubygem-rack, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-rchardet, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2 rubygem-rmail, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-ruby-libvirt,LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-sassc-rails, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL rubygem-scanf, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-uuid, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT OR LicenseRef-Callaway-CC-BY-SA rubygem-xmlrpc, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD Package author list: package, owner(, other contributors) rubygem-ansi: stevetraylen rubygem-bcrypt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf: jackorp, pvalena rubygem-cookiejar: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-hashery: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-hiredis: vondruch, pvalena, tdawson rubygem-idn: spstarr, tdawson rubygem-macaddr: valtri rubygem-marcel: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-narray: besser82 rubygem-ncursesw: dcallagh rubygem-open4: vondruch, tdawson rubygem-rack: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, tdawson rubygem-rchardet: stevetraylen rubygem-rdoc: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig rubygem-rmail: dcallagh rubygem-ruby-libvirt: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, clalance, tdawson rubygem-sassc-rails: vondruch, pvalena rubygem-scanf: ekohl, brandfbb rubygem-uuid: valtri rubygem-xmlrpc: jackorp, pvalena

1 0

Updating json 2.7.5 on F42
by Mamoru TASAKA 05 Nov '24

05 Nov '24

Hello, all: rubygem-json 2.7.5 is released and I am going to update rawhide (F42) rubygem-json to this version. (because the upcoming ruby 3.4.0 will anyway have this or higher version of rubygem-json.) Mass rebuild for this version of rubygem-json shows that the following pkg(s) will newly FTBFS: rubygem-activesupport https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-6/buil… 1) Failure: TestJSONEncoding#test_hash_keys_encoding [test/json/encoding_test.rb:59]: --- expected +++ actual @@ -1 +1 @@ -"{\"\\u003c\\u003e\":\"\\u003c\\u003e\"}" +"{\"<>\":\"\\u003c\\u003e\"}" git bisect shows that the above failure begins with: https://github.com/ruby/json/commit/e125072130229e54a651f7b11d7d5a782ae7fb65 So git commit message shows: ''' Directly use `generate_json_string` for object keys instead of `generate_json`. Since the object key is already confirmed to be a string, using a generic dispatch function brings an unnecessary overhead. ''' But as the side effect, now object key value is not going to be escaped. I am not sure if this is desired or not. Regards, Mamoru

2 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig November 2024