ruby-sig November 2025

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
4 discussions

Current FTBFS status of rubygem-XXX packages for ruby4.0.0dev
by Mamoru TASAKA 12 Dec '25

12 Dec '25

Hello, ruby-sig folks: Trying with ruby 4.0.0dev (2025-11-27 master bee02c41bc) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/bee02c41bc15780a45f47986ef638e17ca323ec3 out of ~407 rubygem-XXXX packages, currently 22 packages FTBFS. 9 of them are due to dependencies for already retired packages. ------------------------------------- [ 1] rubygem-em-websocket https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/97… No match for argument: rubygem(em-spec) Perhaps needed dependency has already retired. ------------------------------------- [ 2] rubygem-ethon https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… Failures: 1) Ethon::Multi::Options socket_action mode #timerfunction callbacks allows multi_code return values Failure/Error: expect(calls.last).to eq(-1) # cancels the timer expected: -1 got: 0 (compared using ==) # ./spec/ethon/multi/options_spec.rb:103:in 'block (4 levels) in <top (required)>' Not investigated yet ------------------------------------- [ 3] rubygem-faraday https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… So many errors: 2265 examples, 119 failures, 1 pending Many of them looks like below, perhaps incompatibility with rack3 NoMethodError: undefined method 'read' for nil # ./spec/support/webmock_rack_app.rb:52:in 'WebmockRackApp#req_body' # ./spec/support/webmock_rack_app.rb:11:in 'WebmockRackApp#call' # /usr/share/gems/gems/rack-test-2.2.0/lib/rack/test.rb:360:in 'Rack::Test::Session#process_request' # /usr/share/gems/gems/rack-test-2.2.0/lib/rack/test.rb:153:in 'Rack::Test::Session#request' # ./lib/faraday/adapter/rack.rb:63:in 'Faraday::Adapter::Rack#execute_request' # ./lib/faraday/adapter/rack.rb:47:in 'Faraday::Adapter::Rack#call' # ./lib/faraday/response.rb:11:in 'Faraday::Response::Middleware#call' # ./lib/faraday/request/url_encoded.rb:25:in 'Faraday::Request::UrlEncoded#call' # ./lib/faraday/request/multipart.rb:25:in 'Faraday::Request::Multipart#call' # ./lib/faraday/rack_builder.rb:153:in 'Faraday::RackBuilder#build_response' ------------------------------------- [ 4] rubygem-gem2rpm https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-gem2rpm-1.0.2-build/gem2rpm-1.0.2/usr/share/gems/gems/gem2rpm-1.0.2/lib/gem2rpm/gem/spec_fetcher.rb:2:in 'Kernel#require': cannot load such file -- ostruct (LoadError) ostruct dep is needed + some backports from the upstream git is needed ref: https://github.com/fedora-ruby/gem2rpm/issues/127 ------------------------------------- [ 5] rubygem-jekyll https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… [ 6] rubygem-jekyll-asciidoc https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… [ 7] rubygem-jekyll-feed https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… [ 8] rubygem-jekyll-git-authors https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… [ 9] rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… [10] rubygem-jekyll-toc https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… No match for argument: rubygem(terminal-table) Needed dependency is retired ------------------------------------- [11] rubygem-mini_magick https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… Failures: 1) MiniMagick::Image#composite yields an optional block Failure/Error: yield composite if block_given? TypeError: wrong argument type MiniMagick::Tool (expected Array) # ./lib/mini_magick/image.rb:515:in 'block in MiniMagick::Image#composite' # ./lib/mini_magick/tool.rb:34:in 'MiniMagick::Tool.new' # ./lib/mini_magick.rb:28:in 'block (2 levels) in <module:MiniMagick>' # ./lib/mini_magick/image.rb:514:in 'MiniMagick::Image#composite' # ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb:609:in 'block (4 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/lib/mini_magick/image_spec.rb:610:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' Not knowing what this means. Reported to the upstream: https://github.com/minimagick/minimagick/issues/599 No response so far. Note that vagrant-libvirt is failing in the similar way at the first glance (note investigated in detail): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubydep-heavypkg-40-01/buil… 340) VagrantPlugins::ProviderLibvirt::Util::NetworkUtil #libvirt_networks should retrieve the list of networks Failure/Error: let(:machine) { iso_env.machine(:test, :libvirt) } TypeError: wrong argument type Vagrant::Config::V2::DummyConfig (expected Array) # /usr/share/vagrant/gems/gems/vagrant-2.3.4/plugins/kernel_v2/config/vm.rb:713:in 'Kernel#inspect' # /usr/share/vagrant/gems/gems/vagrant-2.3.4/plugins/kernel_v2/config/vm.rb:713:in 'VagrantPlugins::Kernel_V2::VMConfig#get_provider_config' # /usr/share/vagrant/gems/gems/vagrant-2.3.4/lib/vagrant/vagrantfile.rb:75:in 'Vagrant::Vagrantfile#machine' # /usr/share/vagrant/gems/gems/vagrant-2.3.4/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:740:in 'Vagrant::Environment#machine' # ./spec/support/unit_context.rb:26:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/support/unit_context.rb:37:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/support/unit_context.rb:51:in 'block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/support/unit_context.rb:43:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems.rb:303:in 'Kernel#load' # /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems.rb:303:in 'Gem.activate_and_load_bin_path' ------------------------------------- [12] rubygem-nenv https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… No match for argument: rubygem(coveralls) ------------------------------------- [13] rubygem-pathspec https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… No match for argument: rubygem(fakefs) ------------------------------------- [14] rubygem-pry https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… So many errors, not have investigated yet. ------------------------------------- [15] rubygem-rdoc https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-rdoc-6.14.2-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/gems/plugins/rdoc_plugin.rb This rdoc is 6.14.2, so first upgrading to the latest is bettter. ------------------------------------- [16] rubygem-redis-client https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… /usr/share/ruby/did_you_mean/core_ext/name_error.rb:24: warning: benchmark is not part of the default gems since Ruby 4.0.0. Install benchmark from RubyGems. But even if adding "BR: rubygem(benchmark)", build still fails like: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-trybuild-01/bui… 375 runs, 204 assertions, 0 failures, 320 errors, 0 skips All looks like 320) Error: RedisClientTest#test_measure_round_trip_delay: RedisClient::CannotConnectError: Connection refused - connect(2) for 127.0.0.1:16380 (redis://127.0.0.1:16380) /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:1661:in 'Socket#__connect_nonblock' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:1661:in 'Socket#connect_nonblock' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:60:in 'Addrinfo#connect_internal' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:141:in 'Addrinfo#connect' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:954:in 'block in Socket.tcp_without_fast_fallback' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:231:in 'Array#each' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:231:in 'Addrinfo.foreach' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:943:in 'Socket.tcp_without_fast_fallback' /usr/share/ruby/socket.rb:671:in 'Socket.tcp' lib/redis_client/ruby_connection.rb:119:in 'RedisClient::RubyConnection#connect' lib/redis_client/ruby_connection.rb:51:in 'RedisClient::RubyConnection#initialize' lib/redis_client.rb:746:in 'block in RedisClient#connect' lib/redis_client/middlewares.rb:12:in 'RedisClient::BasicMiddleware#connect' lib/redis_client.rb:745:in 'RedisClient#connect' lib/redis_client.rb:732:in 'RedisClient#raw_connection' lib/redis_client.rb:697:in 'RedisClient#ensure_connected' lib/redis_client.rb:277:in 'RedisClient#call' test/support/client_test_helper.rb:43:in 'ClientTestHelper#setup' ------------------------------------- [17] rubygem-rspec-core https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… Failed examples: rspec ./spec/rspec/core/shared_example_group_spec.rb[1:3:8] # RSpec::Core::SharedExampleGroup shared_examples_for displays a helpful message when you define a shared example group in *_spec.rb file rspec ./spec/rspec/core/shared_example_group_spec.rb[1:2:8] # RSpec::Core::SharedExampleGroup shared_examples displays a helpful message when you define a shared example group in *_spec.rb file rspec ./spec/rspec/core/shared_example_group_spec.rb[1:4:8] # RSpec::Core::SharedExampleGroup shared_context displays a helpful message when you define a shared example group in *_spec.rb file rspec ./spec/rspec/core/hooks_spec.rb:187 # RSpec::Core::Hooks#around when it does not run the example indicates which around hook did not run the example in the pending message Not having investigated yet, however perhaps error message format changed. ------------------------------------- [18] rubygem-rspec-expectations https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… Many errors: 2441 examples, 28 failures, 8 pending Not having investigated yet, however perhaps error message format changed. ------------------------------------- [19] rubygem-rspec-mocks https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… Failures: 1) RSpec::Mocks::Matchers::Receive expect(...).to receive ordered with receive counts does not result in infinite recursion when `respond_to?` is stubbed Failure/Error: expect { obj = Object.new expect(obj).to receive(:respond_to?).with('something highly unlikely') obj.respond_to?(:not_what_we_wanted) }.to raise_error(/received :respond_to\? with unexpected arguments/) expected Exception with message matching /received :respond_to\? with unexpected arguments/, got #<SystemStackError: stack level too deep> with backtrace: # ./spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb:673:in 'block (5 levels) in <module:Mocks>' # ./spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb:674:in 'block (4 levels) in <module:Mocks>' # /usr/share/gems/gems/aruba-2.3.2/lib/aruba/rspec.rb:40:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # /usr/share/gems/gems/aruba-2.3.2/lib/aruba/rspec.rb:27:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb:674:in 'block (4 levels) in <module:Mocks>' # /usr/share/gems/gems/aruba-2.3.2/lib/aruba/rspec.rb:40:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # /usr/share/gems/gems/aruba-2.3.2/lib/aruba/rspec.rb:27:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' Not having investigated yet, anyway will have to report to the upstream ------------------------------------- [20] rubygem-sinatra https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… 1) Failure: RdocTest#test_renders_rdoc_files_in_views_path_0 [test/rdoc_test.rb:25]: Expected /<h1[^>]*>Hello From RDoc(<span><a href=\"#label-Hello\+From\+RDoc\">¶<\/a> <a href=\"#(documentation|top)\">↑<\/a><\/span>)?<\/h1>/ to match # encoding: ASCII-8BIT # valid: true "\n<h1 id=\"label-Hello+From+RDoc\"><a href=\"#label-Hello+From+RDoc\">Hello From RDoc</a></h1>\n". 2) Failure: RdocTest#test_renders_inline_rdoc_strings_0 [test/rdoc_test.rb:19]: Expected /<h1[^>]*>Hiya(<span><a href=\"#label-Hiya\">¶<\/a> <a href=\"#(documentation|top)\">↑<\/a><\/span>)?<\/h1>/ to match # encoding: ASCII-8BIT # valid: true "\n<h1 id=\"label-Hiya\"><a href=\"#label-Hiya\">Hiya</a></h1>\n". 1036 runs, 2332 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors, 3 skips Recently rdoc is upgraded to 2.16.0 and perhaps some output from rdoc changed. ------------------------------------- [21] rubygem-sinatra-cross_origin https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… 13 tests, 13 assertions, 13 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications Maybe incompatibility with rack3 which rejects upper case in header. ------------------------------------- [22] rubygem-yard https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygems-40-all-01/build/98… rspec ./spec/handlers/ruby/base_spec.rb:35 # YARD::Handlers::Ruby::Base#valid_handler? handles string input (matches AstNode#source) rspec ./spec/handlers/ruby/base_spec.rb:54 # YARD::Handlers::Ruby::Base#valid_handler? handles regex input (matches AstNode#source) rspec ./spec/handlers/ruby/base_spec.rb:73 # YARD::Handlers::Ruby::Base#valid_handler? handles #method_call(:methname) on a valid AST All of these contains: NameError: uninitialized constant YARD::Tags::TypesExplainer::Parser::Ruby # ./spec/handlers/ruby/base_spec.rb:59:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:129:in 'block (2 levels) in <top (required)>' I don't know what the above means so far. Reported: https://github.com/lsegal/yard/issues/1635 No response so far Regards, Mamoru

4 13

Ruby 3.5
by Jarek Prokop 21 Nov '25

21 Nov '25

Hi everybody, It is the time of the year to look at upcoming version of Ruby. I am continually integrating the master upstream branch in my Fedora fork: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jackorp/rpms/ruby/commits/ruby-3.5 It currently contains RHEL specific bits as well. I am developing for both EL and Fedora from the same repo at the moment. I'll create a cleaned up Fedora PR (without RHEL bits) into the official repo later in development process. And here are some interesting bits from the new release so far: * Similarly to 3.4, the biggest change are the unbundled default gems. They are also kept in `bundled-gems` subpackage. I try to keep the file lists very similar to what would be the gem2rpm output. * Most notably, rdoc and irb were promoted to bundled gems. * Set module is now implemented in C instead of Ruby. * A new JIT, the ZJIT is being developed, same as YJIT it should require nothing more than rustc [0]. * It is disabled for now. Building support for both YJIT and ZJIT in the same build is only possible with cargo so far [1]. Only 1 can be built with only rustc at a time. I haven't focused on that area yet. * RJIT was removed. The builds will be available in my copr jackorp/ruby-3.5 for at least the duration of the development: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jackorp/ruby-3.5/ There is also a preliminary mass-prebuild copr repo(s) for the current snapshot: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jackorp/ruby-3.5-snapshot-rebuild https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jackorp/ruby-3.5-snapshot-rebuild.c… I plan to re-run it on new snapshots, the repo will remain the name. It will be removed completely once we have Ruby 3.5 in Rawhide. As always, please give the Ruby 3.5 some testing and looking forward to your feedback. Regards, Jarek [0] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21221 [1] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/92b218fbc379fe85792eb060b71520e271971335

4 10

SPDX Status for Rubygems in Fedora as of 2025-11-21
by Jarek Prokop 21 Nov '25

21 Nov '25

Hi all, current Fedora Ruby gems' license state. Regards, Jarek * Total rubygems in Fedora: 408 * Total rubygems checked: 406 * Fedora License field and gem2rpm license match and license-validate succeeds: 296/406 * license-validate says they are OK SPDX, but licenses may or may not match between Fedora and upstream: 390/406 * license-validate with converted conjunctions: 390/406 * Action required: 0/406 Packages that need to convert to valid SPDX: None! Packages that contain LicenseRef-Callaway-.* (and should be reviewed and converted to SPDX): rubygem-, fedora_license rubygem-ansi, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf,LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND ISC rubygem-cookiejar, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-hashery, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-idn, Apache-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-macaddr, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-narray, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND Ruby rubygem-ncursesw, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ rubygem-open4, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD OR Ruby rubygem-rchardet, LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2 rubygem-rmail, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-scanf, LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD rubygem-uuid, LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT OR LicenseRef-Callaway-CC-BY-SA rubygem-xmlrpc, Ruby OR LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD Package author list: package, owner(, other contributors) rubygem-ansi: stevetraylen rubygem-bcrypt_pbkdf: jackorp, pvalena rubygem-cookiejar: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-hashery: vondruch, ruby-packagers-sig, pvalena rubygem-idn: spstarr, tdawson rubygem-macaddr: valtri rubygem-narray: besser82 rubygem-ncursesw: dcallagh rubygem-open4: vondruch, tdawson rubygem-rchardet: stevetraylen rubygem-rmail: dcallagh rubygem-scanf: ekohl, brandfbb rubygem-uuid: valtri rubygem-xmlrpc: jackorp, pvalena

1 0

Ruby 3.5 change proposal draft
by Jarek Prokop 05 Nov '25

05 Nov '25

Hi all, I have drafted a change proposal for Ruby 3.5: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.5 It's an adjusted copy of the Ruby 3.4 proposal <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.4> The Detailed Description section and links to upstream notes can be expected to change as upstream will update them. Please give the 3.5 draft a look, I'd like to submit it by the end of week if there are no objections, I'm taking PTO 10 to 18th of November, so alternatively, Vít can submit it, who volunteered as co-owner offline. Speaking of additional owners, is there somebody else who wants to join? Mamoru, as before with Ruby 3.4 you are very helpful to the effort from the start, let me know if you want to be added to Ruby 3.5 change as owner as well. Thanks, Jarek

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig November 2025