Re: Cached .gem file - include it or not

[Darryl L. Pierce]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
<snip>
> > > And this is even what is in current fedora-review(1) as in its output is:
> >
> > [x]: MUST Gem package must exclude cached Gem.
>
> I already asked to relax this MUST:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848283
> > I do not understand why it is MUST item. And anyway, why it could not be
> > present.
>
> It just consumes space and the functionality it serves is replaced
> by RPM functionality.

+1 It strikes me that the gem file itself is fairly redundant on a
Fedora system. Does anything in Ruby actually touch the gem?