Re: Use rubygem(foo) or rubygem-foo

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Josef Stribny wrote, at 01/20/2014 11:38 PM +9:00:
> Hi,
> > rubygem(typical_file_you_should_require) seems much harder to implement,
> > as far as I remember once python packages tried to do this, however it
> > gave up. I think we can start with what may be implemented easier.
>
> then if rubygem(foo) and rubygem-foo shall be equivalent I would
> rather see an agreement that we will recommend to use only one of those.

So use rubygem(foo) as I said before.