On 08/11/2011 03:17 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> > What about something like "fake-bundler" which
would implement the
> > Bundler DSL to allow execution of the Gemfile, but it would just require
> > the gems? I mean the "fake-bundler" does not exist, but it should not
be
> > that hard to write it IMO :)
Yeah, Jay and I discussed that. It sounds like a good enhancement to the above
proposal.
+1
for the same syntax. That would ease things...
--
Later,
Lukas "lzap" Zapletal