I agree the intent to create fake libraries for SimpleCov, Coveralls
It makes each rubygem package easy and clean. That's good.
But ruby-devel is used for the use case to build the rubygem that has
a C extension, with ruby.h
I think that ruby-devel's "devel" means user's development, not
If we add the fake libraries, users are confused to refer the fake libraries.
I assume that the fake libraries are used for the use case of our rpm
packaging development only.
I would prefer to create new ruby's sub RPM package or separated RPM
package such as
* "ruby-packagers-utils": inspired from scl-utils
Then each rubygem-foo.spec use like this if it is necessary.
Jun Aruga / He - His - Him