I'm not sure on that. I'm just packaging them for OpenNebula, I have little ruby
development experience. I would need assistance in that effort.
--- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 7:39 AM
Could you please try to migrate them
to RSpec 2.x? It should not be a
big problem (although I understand that it requires more
work).
Vit
Dne 25.7.2011 19:01, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
> Im about to submit whole bunch of rubygems to Fedora.
Most of them use rspec 1.3.
>
> On Mon Jul 25th, 2011 10:10 AM EDT Mo Morsi wrote:
>
>> Since this list is a lot shorter than the
corresponding list in Fedora,
>> perhaps we can get these package maintainers to
update to RSpec 2.
>>
>> Otherwise, perhaps we can leave it in there as
there for now, push the
>> rspec-core and other subcomponents to EPEL, and
update the BoxGrinder
>> RPM to depend on those subcomponents instead of
rspec itself?
>>
>> -Mo
>>
>> On 07/22/2011 09:18 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote:
>>> For EPEL 6 - exactly 5:
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src
--whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src
>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src
>>> rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src
>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src
>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src
>>>
>>> For EPEL 5 - also 5:
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src
--whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el5.src
>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el5.src
>>> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.el5.src
>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-2.el5.src
>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-2.el5.src
>>>
>>> --Marek
>>>
>>> On 22 lip 2011, at 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
>>>> RSpec 2 as they are in F16 can be imported
into EPEL right now. Any idea
>>>> how many packages depends on RSpec in
EPEL?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dne 21.7.2011 20:49, Marek Goldmann
napsal(a):
>>>>> There is one more thing:
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I upgraded to RSpec 2 in Fedora. I
plan to submit BoxGrinder to EPEL 6, but there is only RSpec
1.3. What would be the approach to bump RSpec there?
>>>>>
>>>>> --Marek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18 lip 2011, at 18:49, Mo Morsi
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps we can shoot for doing
this w/ F17, and if we are unable to
>>>>>> migrate all the dependent packages
over, then add a rspec1 compat
>>>>>> package to buy us some more time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any case, would rather push
this off to F17 myself as a few of us are
>>>>>> going through and updating alot of
the rails related plugins to be
>>>>>> compatible w/ Rails 3 in Fedora.
We're trying to get this done by the
>>>>>> F16 deadline next week.
>>>>> --Marek
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig