On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the later. However, I am not sure everybody else will be happy with this step. Was it discussed before? Sorry, I am not following Fedora Rails development that long :/
Yea, we went back and forth on this a few times and I believe the general consensus was to do the update.
Dne 11.1.2011 19:11, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a):
The Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for Fedora are just about ready to go. Please
look at and review the Specs and SRPMs below:
Rails: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails.spec
There are missing dependency on railties and bundler, where there is enforced reference to rake which should not be necessary according to rails gemspec: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v3.0.3/rails.gemspec
Good catch on these, I probably already had them installed when I was building these rpms. I'll add them to a revised set of rpms which I'll send out soon. I also noticed a missing activemodel dependency for activeresource (which isn't a big deal since activemodel 3.0.3 has been submitted to Fedora) as well as a rack ~> 1.2.1 dependency for actionpack. The latter is a little more concerning as the current Rack version in Fedora is 1.1.0 and if Rails 3 doesn't play well with this (we can try patching rails itself) we may have to update that as well.
-Mo