then I am getting conflicting views since OpenNebula folks said they asked upstream and
they were told to use data_mapper?
if anything we would just patch OpenNebula to use 'datamapper' if we have to No
big deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marek Goldmann <mgoldman(a)redhat.com>
To: Ruby SIG mailing list <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:53:07 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they highlight
"datamapper" over "data_mapper":
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html
It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier:
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-102-released.html
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-100-released.html
...
IMHO the dash version is published for compatibility reasons.
--Marek
On 27 lip 2011, at 09:25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Actually there are available both gems, datamapper as well as
data_mapper ...
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig