Re: ruby-sig FAS group and rubygems build in Copr

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

I will agree with you. +1.
"1)" looks convenient.

Jun

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vít Ondruch" 
> To: [e-mail]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:57:37 PM
> Subject: ruby-sig FAS group and rubygems build in Copr
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> You probably noticed, that there is ongoing build of all Python packages
> in Copr [1] and today, I was approached by Miroslav Suchý, that he'd
> like to do the same for rubygems. And this in turn triggered these
> questions:
> Would you be interested to create ruby-sig group in FAS? We could
>
> make the group owner of some packages and in turn, the members of the
> group could maintain the packages, without explicitly asking for some ACLs.
> For the Copr rebuild of rubygems, there needs to be some FAS group
>
> again. Python guys are asking for "pypi-builds-sig" group [2], hence
> following their lead, I'd like to ask for "rubygems-builds-sig" group
> (note that although I don't like the '-sig' suffix in this case, it is
> mandated by the infrastructure ticket template).
>
> So what are your thoughts?
>
> Vít
>
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>
> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5311
>
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]