Mamoru TASAKA wrote, at 01/20/2014 07:00 PM +9:00:
Achilleas Pipinellis wrote, at 01/20/2014 07:37 AM +9:00:
> I know that both result to the same thing (if I remember correctly I had
> asked Vit about this in IRC), but I have forgotten their real difference.
> My attention got caught by a comment Josef made in one of his reviews
> , saying that rubygem-foo is the new syntax. If that's the case, I
> would like to propose 2 changes:
> a) A reference in the wiki
> b) An implementation for gem2rpm
> I guess b) could be fairly easy by changing the templates.
> By starting with these steps, there will be a push to use the new syntax
> from now on. What do you think?
> : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979749#c2
Please use syntax other interpreters do:
i.e. use rubygem(foo), not rubygem-foo.
The idea here is that ideally like perl or so and pkgconfig(foo), etc, this type of
dependency should be handled by rpmbuild _automatically_, i.e. rpmbuild automatically
adds provides/requires rubygem(foo). Currently this is done by gem2rpm, however if
this could be done on building rpmbuild side, it would be more appreciated.