Dne 07. 01. 21 v 6:19 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
rubygem-snmp - builds ok
This one ^^ is noarch and should not have devepnedncy on ruby-devel IMO.
Should not need rebuild. There might be more like this.
This struck me be surprise :( I executed scratch build, everything
looked OK only the arm was about to finish, so I executed the real build
just to find there is segfault on ARM :/
Vít
rubygem-typhoeus - same as ethon
(
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59092598)
The scratch-builds themselves can be found here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?view=toplevel&owner=pvalena...
Regards,
Pavel
>
>
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:30 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
>
>
> Dne 06. 01. 21 v 14:14 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> One new change in Ruby 3.0 is `%{gem_dir}/plugins` directory, which now
> contains are rubygems plugins to load.
> Example change:
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-yard/pull-request/1#_2__64
>
>
> Good catch. I have completely missed that. Here [1] is fix with proposed
> `%gem_plugin` macro for packager convenience. Please give it try.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> [1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/76
>
>
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...