Dne 26.4.2017 v 16:34 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26.4.2017 v 16:23 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Ok, thanks to everywhere who already tried :)
> Dne 26.4.2017 v 13:24 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Hi everybody,
>> As I promised earlier , the ruby-sig and ruby-packagers-sig were
>> established, together with ruby-packagers-sig mailing list . Not sure
>> precisely how this is going to pan out, but lets try this:
>> 1) I would appreciate if we can transform the list of SIG members 
>> into the ruby-sig FAS group. Therefore, can I ask interested parties to
>> apply for this group in FAS? As soon as you apply, I will sponsor you
>> and I'll select a few of you as additional sponsors. Not sure what
>> should be the mininal level to sponsor members, but the bar shouldn't be
>> high. May be introduction on ruby-sig ML together with ruby package
>> review could suffice ...
> I disabled to "invite only" setup for for the ruby-sig group. So you
> should be able to apply now. You still needs to be sponsored.
>> 2) Any of you who is maintaining some interesting package should think
>> about (a) adding ruby-packagers-sig group as a administrator of the
>> package (b) consider moving the ownership of the package to
>> ruby-packages-sig (but please I hope it won't end up just as a junkyard
>> of packages you don't have time to maintain anymore ;) ). As of
>> membership in ruby-packagers-sig, I propose that the minimal level for
>> sponsoring into this group should be maintenance of 5 ruby related
>> package and be packager at least 1 year (possibly with some exception,
>> especially for full time maintainers).
> I should clarify that IMO the "ruby-packagers-sig" ML should be invite
> only in the same manner as the ruby-packager-sig FAS group. Once you get
> sponsored into the FAS group, you should be added to ML (but this is not
> automatic, so the sponsor should not forget).
Actually, the once somebody is sponsored into "ruby-packagers-sig" they
should request the ML access if they are interested (they should be ;))
> To get sponsored into this
> group, it is probably good idea to send an email to ruby-sig ML
> explaining the reasoning and your history in Fedora. Something along the
> lines of proven packager request or packaging sponsor:
Actually, everybody sponsored into ruby-packager-sig should probably
become sponsor in ruby-sig ...
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org