On Sunday, April 15, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Wan Zuhao wrote:
I see your point.
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:On 2012-04-14 21:08, Wan Zuhao wrote:Hi Jeroen,What you've suggested is definitely a good idea. I do agree it'simportantto reflect which *version*, in addtion to the name, link, etc. of aparticular gem that was converted into rpm, as sometimes the latestpatchesand bug fixes are not included in the rpm.The point is also, sometimes bug fixes (especially security issues)*are* in fact included in the RPM, but the gem/rpm package versionnumber would not reflect that.Kind regards,Jeroen van Meeuwen--Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AGe: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.comm: +44 74 2516 3817pgp: 9342 BF08_______________________________________________ruby-sig mailing list