Running Ruby 1.9.3, I get these from RbConfig:
irb(main):003:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['ruby_version']
=> "1.9.1"
irb(main):004:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['LIBRUBY']
=> "libruby.so.1.9.1"
irb(main):005:0> RbConfig::CONFIG['RUBY_PROGRAM_VERSION']
=> "1.9.3"
Could you provide a specific case of the incompatibility you are talking about?
Regards,
Bohuslav.
----- Original Message -----
I started making a patch for Ruby 1.9 and ran into something odd.
The
1.9.3 rpms built from the ruby.spec project, provide a ruby(abi) of
1.9.1. I assure you that 1.9.3 and 1.9.1 are not 100% compatible.
Could we move the ruby.spec rpms to 1.9.3? Or if we want something
more generic possibly 1.9.
Mike
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Dne 13.1.2012 02:59, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael
>> Stahnke<mastahnke(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Has gem2rpm been updated for the Ruby 1.9 changes? The
>>> guidelines
>>> seem quite a bit different, an the gem2rpm macros in the current
>>> state
>>> (at least on EL6) don't map up. Things like
>>>
>>> %gemdir rather than %gem_dir.
>>
>> I probably should have also been clear I am well-aware the Ruby
>> 1.9
>> changes won't impact EL6, but at my work they do :)
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
>
> It was not updated yet, but any help is greatly appreciated. I am
> accepting
> pull requests on github.
>
> Vit
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig