If it's preferable, can someone take a look at all my proposed rubygem packages?
Although I managed to get most of them to build using the developer's testing methods.
If it's easy to switch them to use RSpec 2.x, by just adjusting dependency and using
rspec instead of rake for test validation I can switch all of mine.
Otherwise, I'm not sure how to proceed.
----- Original Message -----
From: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr(a)rogers.com>
To: Ruby SIG mailing list <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:24:34 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
then I am getting conflicting views since OpenNebula folks said they asked upstream and
they were told to use data_mapper?
if anything we would just patch OpenNebula to use 'datamapper' if we have to No
big deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Marek Goldmann <mgoldman(a)redhat.com>
To: Ruby SIG mailing list <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:53:07 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they highlight
"datamapper" over "data_mapper":
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html
It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier:
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-102-released.html
http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-100-released.html
...
IMHO the dash version is published for compatibility reasons.
--Marek
On 27 lip 2011, at 09:25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Actually there are available both gems, datamapper as well as
data_mapper ...
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig