On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:09 -0400, Mo Morsi wrote:
On 05/26/2011 06:40 PM, Christopher McCrory wrote:
> Now that I work in a ruby shop, I took some time and built ruby 1.9.2
> rpms. Most of my experience with ruby is running puppet so YMMV.
> feedback welcome.
Hrm just glancing at your rpms, it seems that they are meant to replace
the currently existing ruby 1.8 ones, not live along side of them correct?
correct. Changing the spec file to install in parallel isn't hard.
IIRC, add --suffix=192, append 192 in a few places, and exclude
libruby.so . But I found that either ruby without gems is not very
useful :( One of my goals is to get a ruby 1.9.2 stack to run puppet.
So many gems are required that doing dual gem rpms is too much work for
It would really help if ruby could search both 1.8 and 1.9.1 directories
for gems ala perl.
ruby-sig mailing list
To the optimist, the glass is half full.
To the pessimist, the glass is half empty.
To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.