rails 3

[Frédéric Logier]

Hi,

Rails 3 is out
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2010/8/29/rails-3-0-it-s-done and it need
at least ruby 1.8.7 ... So there will no way to use Rails 3 with F14 ?

[Mamoru Tasaka]

Frédéric Logier wrote, at 08/30/2010 05:52 PM +9:00:
> Hi,
>
> Rails 3 is out
> http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2010/8/29/rails-3-0-it-s-done and it need
> at least ruby 1.8.7 ... So there will no way to use Rails 3 with F14 ?

F-14 uses ruby 1.8.7 p302 currently. However while I think we should
upgrade F-14 rails to 2.3.8, I don't know  if we can push
Rails 3 for F-14... rails maintainers, thoughts?
(Or someone wants to support parallel installation support of
  rails 2.3.8 and rails 3.0 on Fedora?)

Mamoru

[Frédéric Logier]

Le lundi 30 août 2010 à 18:32 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka a écrit :
> Frédéric Logier wrote, at 08/30/2010 05:52 PM +9:00:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Rails 3 is out
> > http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2010/8/29/rails-3-0-it-s-done and it need
> > at least ruby 1.8.7 ... So there will no way to use Rails 3 with F14 ?
>
> F-14 uses ruby 1.8.7 p302 currently. However while I think we should
> upgrade F-14 rails to 2.3.8, I don't know  if we can push
> Rails 3 for F-14... rails maintainers, thoughts?
> (Or someone wants to support parallel installation support of
>   rails 2.3.8 and rails 3.0 on Fedora?)

It's a good news to know that F14 uses ruby 1.8.7, because many Rails
developers don't care about the Rails's RPM, they use rubygem.

[Mo Morsi]

On 08/30/2010 05:32 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Frédéric Logier wrote, at 08/30/2010 05:52 PM +9:00:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Rails 3 is out
> > http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2010/8/29/rails-3-0-it-s-done and it need
> > at least ruby 1.8.7 ... So there will no way to use Rails 3 with F14 ?
>
> F-14 uses ruby 1.8.7 p302 currently. However while I think we should
> upgrade F-14 rails to 2.3.8, I don't know  if we can push
> Rails 3 for F-14... rails maintainers, thoughts?
> (Or someone wants to support parallel installation support of
>    rails 2.3.8 and rails 3.0 on Fedora?)
>
> Mamoru
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

I'm not currently aware of how compatible Rails 2.3.8 / 3.0.0 are.

I created rails 3.0.0-beta4 rpms a little while back, but I would like 
to update them to the 3.0.0 release and test them out in various 
scenarios to determine any potential issues. If there are major 
incompatibilities we can look into parallel installation support, but if 
not a simple upgrade might be warranted.

It's not currently on my immediate task list, but I will get to this 
eventually if noone gets to it first. Also if you are maintaining a 
package that depends on rails (alot are as they depend of 
activesupport), I would start looking upstream for rails 3.0.0 
compatibility.

You can download the rails 3.0.0-beta4 rpms / srpms here:

http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/322

-Mo

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> I'm not currently aware of how compatible Rails 2.3.8 / 3.0.0 are.

I would argue they are not at all compatible -but that's hear-say. Joost 
Elfering could tell us more (in CC:). Joost, could you please give us some 
insight? Pretty please?

If nothing else, I would argue a rails3 package makes sense, but then again 
I'm not sure how long 2.3.8 is considered to be around; if it's not going to 
be around next year, we could fold back rails3 onto the rails package and 
obsolete / declare dead rails3 maybe?

-- Jeroen

[tommy xiao]

i think push rails 3 is prefered.

2010/9/1 Jeroen van Meeuwen
> Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> > I'm not currently aware of how compatible Rails 2.3.8 / 3.0.0 are.
>
> I would argue they are not at all compatible -but that's hear-say. Joost
> Elfering could tell us more (in CC:). Joost, could you please give us some
> insight? Pretty please?
>
> If nothing else, I would argue a rails3 package makes sense, but then again
> I'm not sure how long 2.3.8 is considered to be around; if it's not going
> to
> be around next year, we could fold back rails3 onto the rails package and
> obsolete / declare dead rails3 maybe?
>
> -- Jeroen
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig