Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

[Achilleas Pipinellis]

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.

Some already raised points:

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
ownership.

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.

Projects that could share the namespace:

1. gem2rpm [1]
2. rubypick [2]
3. pkgwat [3]
4. gem-compare [4]
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]

So, what do you think?

--------

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby

[Josef Stribny]

As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.

Josef

----- Original Message -----
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" 
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.

Some already raised points:

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
ownership.

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.

Projects that could share the namespace:

1. gem2rpm [1]
2. rubypick [2]
3. pkgwat [3]
4. gem-compare [4]
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]

So, what do you think?

--------

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby

[Dan Allen]

+1

fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to
use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in
my experience.

-Dan

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny  wrote:
> As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a
> good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for
> the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
>
> Josef
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" 
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" 
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM
> Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
>
> I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
> discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
>
> Some already raised points:
> We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
>
> taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
> Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
> this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
> Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
> ownership.
> Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
>
> rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
> unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
>
> Projects that could share the namespace:
> gem2rpm [1]
> rubypick [2]
> pkgwat [3]
> gem-compare [4]
> isitfedoraruby [5][6]
>
> So, what do you think?
>
> [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
> [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
> [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
> [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
> [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
> [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
> [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
>
> --
> FAS : axilleas
> GPG : 0xABF99BE5
> Blog: http://axilleas.me
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

[Josef Stribny]

I have just came across the Fedora Cloud SIG organization[0] on GitHub.
They also dropped the "sig", so fedora-ruby seems to be consistent with them.

[0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Allen" 
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:55:47 AM
Subject: Re: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

+1

fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience.

-Dan

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny < [e-mail] > wrote:

As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.

Josef

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" < [e-mail] > 
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" < [e-mail] > 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM 
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own 
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.

Some already raised points:

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already 
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. 
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under 
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, 
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full 
ownership.

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their 
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights 
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.

Projects that could share the namespace:

1. gem2rpm [1] 
2. rubypick [2] 
3. pkgwat [3] 
4. gem-compare [4] 
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]

So, what do you think?

--------

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm 
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick 
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat 
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare 
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby 
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby

[Vít Ondruch]

JFTR, Achilleas went ahead and moved isitfedoraruby under common
namespace at GH:

https://github.com/fedora-ruby

and he was already followed by some other projects/tools. If you have
other (mainly) Fedora or Fedora's Ruby SIG related stuff or you'd like
to help, please ask for invitation, which will be gladly accepted.

Vít

Dne 28.7.2014 17:28, Achilleas Pipinellis napsal(a):
> I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
> discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
>
> Some already raised points:
> We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
>
> taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
> Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
> this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
> Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
> ownership.
> Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
>
> rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
> unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
>
> Projects that could share the namespace:
> gem2rpm [1]
> rubypick [2]
> pkgwat [3]
> gem-compare [4]
> isitfedoraruby [5][6]
>
> So, what do you think?
>
> [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
> [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
> [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
> [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
> [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
> [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
> [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby