I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
Some already raised points:
1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership.
2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
Projects that could share the namespace:
1. gem2rpm [1] 2. rubypick [2] 3. pkgwat [3] 4. gem-compare [4] 5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]
So, what do you think?
--------
[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
Josef
----- Original Message ----- From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" axilleaspi@ymail.com To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
Some already raised points:
1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership.
2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
Projects that could share the namespace:
1. gem2rpm [1] 2. rubypick [2] 3. pkgwat [3] 4. gem-compare [4] 5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]
So, what do you think?
--------
[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
+1
fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience.
-Dan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny jstribny@redhat.com wrote:
As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
Josef
----- Original Message ----- From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" axilleaspi@ymail.com To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
Some already raised points:
- We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership.
- Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
Projects that could share the namespace:
- gem2rpm [1]
- rubypick [2]
- pkgwat [3]
- gem-compare [4]
- isitfedoraruby [5][6]
So, what do you think?
[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
-- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
I have just came across the Fedora Cloud SIG organization[0] on GitHub. They also dropped the "sig", so fedora-ruby seems to be consistent with them.
[0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Allen" dan.j.allen@gmail.com To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:55:47 AM Subject: Re: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
+1
fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience.
-Dan
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny < jstribny@redhat.com > wrote:
As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
Josef
----- Original Message ----- From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" < axilleaspi@ymail.com > To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" < ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
Some already raised points:
1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership.
2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
Projects that could share the namespace:
1. gem2rpm [1] 2. rubypick [2] 3. pkgwat [3] 4. gem-compare [4] 5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]
So, what do you think?
--------
[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
JFTR, Achilleas went ahead and moved isitfedoraruby under common namespace at GH:
https://github.com/fedora-ruby
and he was already followed by some other projects/tools. If you have other (mainly) Fedora or Fedora's Ruby SIG related stuff or you'd like to help, please ask for invitation, which will be gladly accepted.
Vít
Dne 28.7.2014 17:28, Achilleas Pipinellis napsal(a):
I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
Some already raised points:
- We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership.
- Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
Projects that could share the namespace:
- gem2rpm [1]
- rubypick [2]
- pkgwat [3]
- gem-compare [4]
- isitfedoraruby [5][6]
So, what do you think?
[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org