Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

[Achilleas Pipinellis]

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.

Some already raised points:

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
ownership.

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.

Projects that could share the namespace:

1. gem2rpm [1]
2. rubypick [2]
3. pkgwat [3]
4. gem-compare [4]
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]

So, what do you think?

--------

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby

-- 
FAS : axilleas
GPG : 0xABF99BE5
Blog: http://axilleas.me

[Josef Stribny]

As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good
opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't
see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.

Josef

----- Original Message -----
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" <axilleaspi(a)ymail.com&gt;
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.

Some already raised points:

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
ownership.

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.

Projects that could share the namespace:

1. gem2rpm [1]
2. rubypick [2]
3. pkgwat [3]
4. gem-compare [4]
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]

So, what do you think?

--------

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby

-- 
FAS : axilleas
GPG : 0xABF99BE5
Blog: http://axilleas.me
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

[Dan Allen]

+1

fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to
use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in
my experience.

-Dan


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny <jstribny(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe
> it's a
>  good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for
>  the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.
>
>  Josef
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" <axilleaspi(a)ymail.com&gt;
>  To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM
>  Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
>
>  I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
>  discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
>
>  Some already raised points:
>
>  1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
>  taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
>  Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
>  this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
>  Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
>  ownership.
>
>  2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
>  rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
>  unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
>
>  Projects that could share the namespace:
>
>  1. gem2rpm [1]
>  2. rubypick [2]
>  3. pkgwat [3]
>  4. gem-compare [4]
>  5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]
>
>  So, what do you think?
>
>  --------
>
>  [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
>  [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
>  [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
>  [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
>  [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
>  [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
>  [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
>
>  --
>  FAS : axilleas
>  GPG : 0xABF99BE5
>  Blog: http://axilleas.me
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>  


-- 
Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen

[Josef Stribny]

I have just came across the Fedora Cloud SIG organization[0] on GitHub.
They also dropped the "sig", so fedora-ruby seems to be consistent with them.


[0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt;
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:55:47 AM
Subject: Re: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

+1 

fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name
fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience. 

-Dan 


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny < jstribny(a)redhat.com > wrote: 


As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good
opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't
see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'. 

Josef 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" < axilleaspi(a)ymail.com > 
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" < ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM 
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects 

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own 
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is. 

Some already raised points: 

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already 
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. 
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under 
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, 
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full 
ownership. 

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their 
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights 
unfortunately but we'll figure it out. 

Projects that could share the namespace: 

1. gem2rpm [1] 
2. rubypick [2] 
3. pkgwat [3] 
4. gem-compare [4] 
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6] 

So, what do you think? 

-------- 

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm 
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick 
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat 
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare 
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby 
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby 

-- 
FAS : axilleas 
GPG : 0xABF99BE5 
Blog: http://axilleas.me 
_______________________________________________ 
ruby-sig mailing list 
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig 
_______________________________________________ 
ruby-sig mailing list 
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig 



-- 
Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen 

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

[Vít Ondruch]

JFTR, Achilleas went ahead and moved isitfedoraruby under common
namespace at GH:

https://github.com/fedora-ruby

and he was already followed by some other projects/tools. If you have
other (mainly) Fedora or Fedora's Ruby SIG related stuff or you'd like
to help, please ask for invitation, which will be gladly accepted.


Vít



Dne 28.7.2014 17:28, Achilleas Pipinellis napsal(a):
>  I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own
>  discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.
>
>  Some already raised points:
>
>  1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already
>  taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.
>  Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under
>  this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,
>  Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full
>  ownership.
>
>  2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their
>  rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights
>  unfortunately but we'll figure it out.
>
>  Projects that could share the namespace:
>
>  1. gem2rpm [1]
>  2. rubypick [2]
>  3. pkgwat [3]
>  4. gem-compare [4]
>  5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]
>
>  So, what do you think?
>
>  --------
>
>  [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50
>  [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm
>  [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick
>  [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat
>  [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare
>  [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby
>  [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby
>