I did some changes in my fork of gem2rpm , which hopefully solves
most of the notes you have in your blog. The only one which remains
unresolved is the License field, which is not available in the .gemspec
file, so there should be some heuristics. I was thinking about port of
lixensecheck , which is part of rpmdevtools package, but may be
somebody has some tip for already existing gem with similar functionality?
If you have some addition comments and suggestions about Ruby packaging,
please add them into discussion part of packaging guidelines. I would
like to collect there some thoughts and update the guidelines one day.
Of course you can go forward and prepare draft of update Ruby package
guidelines and we can push it through the FESCo later. This would be the
best case of course :)
Dne 20.6.2011 18:20, Lukas Zapletal napsal(a):
its pretty obvious that gem2rpm tool does not produce output that is
fully align with our Ruby& Fedora Guidelines. I blogged about most
important changes that usually need to be done before pushing the
package in the Fedora.
The changes are pretty cosmetic though, but I would like to extend it a
bit maybe and provide more valuable information. Maybe to put this on
the wiki if there is not such a place already. Suggestions?