Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi all,

You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)

What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
to be rebuild:

$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
sort | uniq

You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:

$ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby

If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
which is not what you want.

If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
rebuild your packages yourself, right?).

You can follow the progress at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...

or using:

$ koji list-tagged f24-ruby


As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.


Vít



[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
[4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig

[Pavel Valena]

Hi,

>  What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely
> needs
>  to be rebuild:
>  
>  $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
>  --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
>  sort | uniq 
To get package names, you can use:

$ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf
'%{name}' --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort -u

Also, to get list of your packages (assumes $USER is your FAS name):

$ pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE "^Total: " | cut
-d' ' -f2

To get the list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:

$ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
'^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"

Pavel Valena
Associate Software Engineer
Brno, Czech Republic

RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat

<http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:21:42 PM
Subject: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild

Hi all,

You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)

What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
to be rebuild:

$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
sort | uniq

You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:

$ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby

If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
which is not what you want.

If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
rebuild your packages yourself, right?).

You can follow the progress at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...

or using:

$ koji list-tagged f24-ruby


As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.


Vít



[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
[4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Pavel Valena]

Hi again,

>  $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s '
> ' | grep -vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq" 
I am very sorry, but there is an error in sign('-'), between the two outputs. It
should be &.

To get the correct list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:

$ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
'^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines & \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"

Pavel Valena
Associate Software Engineer
Brno, Czech Republic

RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat

<http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pavel Valena" <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 4:21:19 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild

Hi,

>  What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely
> needs
>  to be rebuild:
>  
>  $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
>  --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
>  sort | uniq 
To get package names, you can use:

$ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf
'%{name}' --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort -u

Also, to get list of your packages (assumes $USER is your FAS name):

$ pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE "^Total: " | cut
-d' ' -f2

To get the list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:

$ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
'^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"

Pavel Valena
Associate Software Engineer
Brno, Czech Republic

RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat

<http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt;
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:21:42 PM
Subject: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild

Hi all,

You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)

What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
to be rebuild:

$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
sort | uniq

You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:

$ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby

If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
which is not what you want.

If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
rebuild your packages yourself, right?).

You can follow the progress at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...

or using:

$ koji list-tagged f24-ruby


As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.


Vít



[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
[4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Ken Dreyer]

This should be a part of fermig! :)

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> Hi again,
>
>> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep
-vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
>
> I am very sorry, but there is an error in sign('-'), between the two outputs.
It should be &.
>
> To get the correct list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
>
> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
'^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines & \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
>
> Pavel Valena
> Associate Software Engineer
> Brno, Czech Republic
>
> RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
>
> <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pavel Valena" <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt;
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 4:21:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
>
> Hi,
>
>> What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
>> to be rebuild:
>>
>> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
>> --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
>> sort | uniq
>
> To get package names, you can use:
>
> $ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src
--qf '%{name}' --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort -u
>
> Also, to get list of your packages (assumes $USER is your FAS name):
>
> $ pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE "^Total: " |
cut -d' ' -f2
>
> To get the list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
>
> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
'^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
--disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
--whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
>
> Pavel Valena
> Associate Software Engineer
> Brno, Czech Republic
>
> RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
>
> <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt;
> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:21:42 PM
> Subject: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
>
> Hi all,
>
> You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
> so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
> F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
> build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
>
> What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> to be rebuild:
>
> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> sort | uniq
>
> You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
> f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
>
> $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby
>
> If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
> which is not what you want.
>
> If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
> sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
> previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
> whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
> rebuild your packages yourself, right?).
>
> You can follow the progress at:
>
>
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...
>
> or using:
>
> $ koji list-tagged f24-ruby
>
>
> As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
> [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
> [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 7.1.2016 v 17:10 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
>  This should be a part of fermig! :) 
There is https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig/pull/5/files

Not sure how to integrate it yet (some command line switch probably?
Pavel?) ... but you can take the file from PR and modify:

https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig/blob/master/all.rb#L5

for the moment.


Vít






>  On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> >> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep
> -vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> > I am very sorry, but there is an error in sign('-'), between the two outputs.
> It should be &.
> >
> > To get the correct list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
> >
> > $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
> '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines & \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> >
> > Pavel Valena
> > Associate Software Engineer
> > Brno, Czech Republic
> >
> > RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> > All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> > Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
> >
> > <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pavel Valena" <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt;
> > To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 4:21:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> >> to be rebuild:
> >>
> >> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> >> --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> >> sort | uniq
> > To get package names, you can use:
> >
> > $ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src
> --qf '%{name}' --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort -u
> >
> > Also, to get list of your packages (assumes $USER is your FAS name):
> >
> > $ pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE "^Total: " |
> cut -d' ' -f2
> >
> > To get the list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
> >
> > $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE
> '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> >
> > Pavel Valena
> > Associate Software Engineer
> > Brno, Czech Republic
> >
> > RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> > All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> > Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
> >
> > <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt;
> > To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:21:42 PM
> > Subject: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
> > so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
> > F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
> > build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
> >
> > What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> > to be rebuild:
> >
> > $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> > --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> > sort | uniq
> >
> > You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
> > f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
> >
> > $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby
> >
> > If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
> > which is not what you want.
> >
> > If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
> > sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
> > previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
> > whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
> > rebuild your packages yourself, right?).
> >
> > You can follow the progress at:
> >
> >
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...
> >
> > or using:
> >
> > $ koji list-tagged f24-ruby
> >
> >
> > As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
> > [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
> > [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
> > [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi all,

Building vim-command-t, I found out that since Ruby 2.3 packages are now
using weak dependencies wherever possible, I need to tweak a
BuildRequires a bit, since the weak dependencies are ignored during
build. Please adjust the BR as appropriate for your package. Luckily,
this is very likely non issue for rubygem- packages.


Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

This is the current state:

$ koji list-tagged f24-ruby --latest
Build                                     Tag                   Built by
----------------------------------------  -------------------- 
----------------
ruby-2.3.0-52.fc24                        f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-atomic-1.1.99-2.fc24              f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-bcrypt-3.1.10-3.fc24              f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-binding_of_caller-0.7.2-3.fc24    f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-bson_ext-1.10.2-5.fc24            f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-curb-0.8.8-3.fc24                 f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-debug_inspector-0.0.2-4.fc24      f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-eventmachine-1.0.8-1.fc24         f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-ffi-1.9.10-2.fc24                 f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-ox-2.2.3-1.fc24                   f24-ruby              valtri
rubygem-pg-0.18.4-1.fc24                  f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-ruby-libvirt-0.6.0-2.fc24         f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-sqlite3-1.3.11-1.fc24             f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-therubyracer-0.11.0-12.fc24       f24-ruby              vondruch
rubygem-thin-1.6.4-2.fc24                 f24-ruby              vondruch
vim-command-t-2.0-1.fc24                  f24-ruby              vondruch

IOW ~10 % of packages is done. And since I am done with all my packages,
I'm going to rebuild yours, so be warned ;)


Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 7.1.2016 v 17:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>  Dne 7.1.2016 v 17:10 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
> > This should be a part of fermig! :)
>  There is https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig/pull/5/files 
So this is merged now. You can use the '-u' command line parameter to
rebuild just your packages.


Vít


>  Not sure how to integrate it yet (some command line switch probably?
>  Pavel?) ... but you can take the file from PR and modify:
>
>  https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig/blob/master/all.rb#L5
>
>  for the moment.
>
>
>  Vít
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >>> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' |
> grep -vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> >> I am very sorry, but there is an error in sign('-'), between the two
> outputs. It should be &.
> >>
> >> To get the correct list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
> >>
> >> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep
> -vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines & \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> >>
> >> Pavel Valena
> >> Associate Software Engineer
> >> Brno, Czech Republic
> >>
> >> RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> >> All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> >> Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
> >>
> >> <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Pavel Valena" <pvalena(a)redhat.com&gt;
> >> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 4:21:19 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> >>> to be rebuild:
> >>>
> >>> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> >>> --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> >>> sort | uniq
> >> To get package names, you can use:
> >>
> >> $ dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source
> --arch=src --qf '%{name}' --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort -u
> >>
> >> Also, to get list of your packages (assumes $USER is your FAS name):
> >>
> >> $ pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep -vE "^Total: "
> | cut -d' ' -f2
> >>
> >> To get the list of your packages which very likely need to be rebuild:
> >>
> >> $ ruby -e "puts (\`pkgdb-cli list --user $USER | tr -s ' ' | grep
> -vE '^Total: ' | cut -d' ' -f2\`.lines - \`dnf repoquery -q
> --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --qf '%{name}'
> --whatrequires 'ruby-devel'\`.lines).sort.uniq"
> >>
> >> Pavel Valena
> >> Associate Software Engineer
> >> Brno, Czech Republic
> >>
> >> RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.
> >> All of the airlines in the Fortune Global 500 rely on Red Hat.
> >> Find out why at Trusted | Red Hat
> >>
> >> <http://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com&gt;
> >> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:21:42 PM
> >> Subject: Ruby 2.3 - Mass rebuild
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
> >> so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
> >> F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
> >> build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
> >>
> >> What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> >> to be rebuild:
> >>
> >> $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> >> --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> >> sort | uniq
> >>
> >> You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
> >> f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
> >>
> >> $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby
> >>
> >> If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
> >> which is not what you want.
> >>
> >> If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
> >> sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
> >> previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
> >> whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
> >> rebuild your packages yourself, right?).
> >>
> >> You can follow the progress at:
> >>
> >>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...
> >>
> >> or using:
> >>
> >> $ koji list-tagged f24-ruby
> >>
> >>
> >> As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.
> >>
> >>
> >> Vít
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
> >> [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
> >> [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
> >> [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ruby-sig mailing list
> >> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ruby-sig mailing list
> >> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ruby-sig mailing list
> >> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Hello, ruby folks:

Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/07/2016 01:21 AM:
>  Hi all,
>
>  You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
>  so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
>  F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
>  build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
>
>  What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
>  to be rebuild:
>
>  $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
>  --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
>  sort | uniq 
Currently I used:
$ repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=koji-ruby24 --whatrequires
'libruby.so.2.2()(64bit)' | sort

Current leftovers (for libruby.so.2.2) are:

postgresql-plruby-0:0.5.4-6.fc23.x86_64
ruby-libguestfs-1:1.33.1-1.fc24.x86_64
ruby-shogun-0:4.0.1-0.6.git20151219.af8c1df.fc24.x86_64
rubygem-raindrops-0:0.13.0-2.fc23.x86_64
subversion-ruby-0:1.9.3-1.fc24.x86_64

postgresql-plruby:
Build fails:
DEBUG: In function 'pl_init_all',
DEBUG:     inlined from 'pl_internal_call_handler' at plruby.c:526:9:
DEBUG: plruby.c:1660:5: error: call to 'ruby_safe_level_2_error' declared with
attribute error: $SAFE=2 to 4 are obsolete
DEBUG:      rb_set_safe_level(MAIN_SAFE_LEVEL);
DEBUG:      ^
DEBUG: Makefile:239: recipe for target 'plruby.o' failed

Looks like $SAFE on ruby2.3 is valid only if it is 0 or 1.

libguestfs: not tried
shogun: not tried

rubygem-raindrops:
Test fails.
DEBUG: # Running:
DEBUG: ...E...............
DEBUG: Finished in 0.455880s, 41.6777 runs/s, 372.9054 assertions/s.
DEBUG:   1) Error:
DEBUG: TestLinux#test_unix_resolves_symlinks:
DEBUG: RegexpError: /.../n has a non escaped non ASCII character in non ASCII-8BIT script
DEBUG:    
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-raindrops-0.13.0/usr/share/gems/gems/raindrops-0.13.0/lib/raindrops/linux.rb:57:in
`unix_listener_stats'
DEBUG:    
/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-raindrops-0.13.0/usr/share/gems/gems/raindrops-0.13.0/test/test_linux.rb:97:in
`test_unix_resolves_symlinks'
DEBUG: 19 runs, 170 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips

subversion:
Test fails.
koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12558220

>  You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
>  f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
>
>  $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby 
Regards,
Mamoru

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi everybody,

Dne 15.1.2016 v 14:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  Hello, ruby folks:
>
>  Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/07/2016 01:21 AM:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
> > so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
> > F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
> > build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
> >
> > What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> > to be rebuild:
> >
> > $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> > --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> > sort | uniq
>
>  Currently I used:
>  $ repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=koji-ruby24 --whatrequires
>  'libruby.so.2.2()(64bit)' | sort
>
>  Current leftovers (for libruby.so.2.2) are:
>
>  postgresql-plruby-0:0.5.4-6.fc23.x86_64
>  ruby-libguestfs-1:1.33.1-1.fc24.x86_64
>  ruby-shogun-0:4.0.1-0.6.git20151219.af8c1df.fc24.x86_64
>  rubygem-raindrops-0:0.13.0-2.fc23.x86_64
>  subversion-ruby-0:1.9.3-1.fc24.x86_64
>
>  postgresql-plruby:
>  Build fails:
>  DEBUG: In function 'pl_init_all',
>  DEBUG:     inlined from 'pl_internal_call_handler' at plruby.c:526:9:
>  DEBUG: plruby.c:1660:5: error: call to 'ruby_safe_level_2_error'
>  declared with attribute error: $SAFE=2 to 4 are obsolete
>  DEBUG:      rb_set_safe_level(MAIN_SAFE_LEVEL);
>  DEBUG:      ^
>  DEBUG: Makefile:239: recipe for target 'plruby.o' failed
>
>  Looks like $SAFE on ruby2.3 is valid only if it is 0 or 1. 
Postgres guys are aware and looking into this. There is already used
some "safelevel" parameter, not sure if lowering to 1 would help.
Otherwise, some patching (mostly code removal will be needed, something
along these lines: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5455). Will see.

>  libguestfs: not tried 
I asked Rich about rebuild and since they are building quite often, we
agreed that we will look into this after merge of side tag.

>  shogun: not tried 
This is blocked by SWIG if I am not mistaken. And SWIG is broken for
Ruby 2.3:

https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/593

>  rubygem-raindrops:
>  Test fails.
>  DEBUG: # Running:
>  DEBUG: ...E...............
>  DEBUG: Finished in 0.455880s, 41.6777 runs/s, 372.9054 assertions/s.
>  DEBUG:   1) Error:
>  DEBUG: TestLinux#test_unix_resolves_symlinks:
>  DEBUG: RegexpError: /.../n has a non escaped non ASCII character in
>  non ASCII-8BIT script
>  DEBUG:    
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-raindrops-0.13.0/usr/share/gems/gems/raindrops-0.13.0/lib/raindrops/linux.rb:57:in
>  `unix_listener_stats'
>  DEBUG:    
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-raindrops-0.13.0/usr/share/gems/gems/raindrops-0.13.0/test/test_linux.rb:97:in
>  `test_unix_resolves_symlinks'
>  DEBUG: 19 runs, 170 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips 
Have not looked into this yet. Weird error.

>  subversion:
>  Test fails.
>  koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12558220 
This seems to be SWIG yet again.


From my POV, we are good to merge back into the master. Mamoru, please
ask rel-engs if you like, or I'll ask them on Monday (unless there
arises some real blocker). And thank you for the help with rebuild!


Vít

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Hello, again:

Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/16/2016 12:38 AM:
>  Hi everybody,
>
>  Dne 15.1.2016 v 14:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Current leftovers (for libruby.so.2.2) are:
> >
> > postgresql-plruby-0:0.5.4-6.fc23.x86_64
> > ruby-libguestfs-1:1.33.1-1.fc24.x86_64
> > ruby-shogun-0:4.0.1-0.6.git20151219.af8c1df.fc24.x86_64
> > rubygem-raindrops-0:0.13.0-2.fc23.x86_64
> > subversion-ruby-0:1.9.3-1.fc24.x86_64
> >
>   From my POV, we are good to merge back into the master. Mamoru, please
>  ask rel-engs if you like, or I'll ask them on Monday (unless there
>  arises some real blocker). And thank you for the help with rebuild!
>  
Okay, now f24-ruby packages are tagged into f24.
Big thank you for Vít, and thank you for all ruby folks.

Regards,
Mamoru

[Ken Dreyer]

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Mamoru TASAKA
<mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  Okay, now f24-ruby packages are tagged into f24.
>  Big thank you for Vít, and thank you for all ruby folks. 
Yes, thanks Vít!

- Ken

[Vít Ondruch]

It seems there is plenty of issues reported by Koschei. Please check
your packages if possible, you save your time later after mass rebuild.

Thx


Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 15.1.2016 v 14:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  Current leftovers (for libruby.so.2.2) are:
>
>  rubygem-raindrops-0:0.13.0-2.fc23.x86_64 
This one is really weird. One thing I noticed that it seems that Ruby
does not honor the encoding directive in RegExps (or it handles them
differently than strings), so I opened

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12034

And since the raindrops maintainer is Ruby committer, I hope he will
notice (I put him on CC).


Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 15.1.2016 v 14:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  subversion:
>  Test fails.
>  koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12558220 
This seems to be due to Swig 3.0.8:


https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/602



Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi,

I just noticed, that Ruby 2.3 does not respect LANG environment variable
anymore [1]. This is just heads up in case somebody wondered about some
FTBFS (may be Mamoru rebuilding Gherkin?). Hopefully, this will be fixed
soon.

In the mean time

s/LANG=en_US.utf-8/RUBYOPT=-EUTF-8/

might help.


Vít




[1] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12127




Dne 6.1.2016 v 17:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>  Hi all,
>
>  You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
>  so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
>  F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
>  build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
>
>  What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
>  to be rebuild:
>
>  $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
>  --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
>  sort | uniq
>
>  You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
>  f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
>
>  $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby
>
>  If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
>  which is not what you want.
>
>  If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
>  sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
>  previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
>  whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
>  rebuild your packages yourself, right?).
>
>  You can follow the progress at:
>
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...
>
>  or using:
>
>  $ koji list-tagged f24-ruby
>
>
>  As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.
>
>
>  Vít
>
>
>
>  [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
>  [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
>  [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
>  [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Vít Ondruch]

It seems I was bitten by the recent glibc changes. So probably

s/LANG=en_US.utf-8/LANG=C.UTF-8/

should be the right option, since C.UTF-8 should be always available, no
matter what is installed.


Vít



Dne 29.2.2016 v 15:45 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>  Hi,
>
>  I just noticed, that Ruby 2.3 does not respect LANG environment variable
>  anymore [1]. This is just heads up in case somebody wondered about some
>  FTBFS (may be Mamoru rebuilding Gherkin?). Hopefully, this will be fixed
>  soon.
>
>  In the mean time
>
>  s/LANG=en_US.utf-8/RUBYOPT=-EUTF-8/
>
>  might help.
>
>
>  Vít
>
>
>
>
>  [1] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12127
>
>
>
>
>  Dne 6.1.2016 v 17:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > You have probably noticed, that Ruby 2.3 was released during Christmas
> > so we can move forward with the change proposal [1] and get Ruby 2.3 for
> > F24. Actually, I already obtained build target for Ruby 2.3 [2] and
> > build ruby-2.3 package and now its time for you to help :)
> >
> > What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs
> > to be rebuild:
> >
> > $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
> > --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' |
> > sort | uniq
> >
> > You can take the and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using
> > f24-ruby build target, i.e. the build command should look like:
> >
> > $ fedpkg build --target f24-ruby
> >
> > If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.2,
> > which is not what you want.
> >
> > If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package
> > sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during
> > previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for
> > whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to
> > rebuild your packages yourself, right?).
> >
> > You can follow the progress at:
> >
> >
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=331&o...
> >
> > or using:
> >
> > $ koji list-tagged f24-ruby
> >
> >
> > As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome.
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.3
> > [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6324
> > [3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709430
> > [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list
>  ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]